[NCUC-DISCUSS] GGP Applicant Support Subject Matter Expert Input Request

Wed Feb 15 22:57:03 CET 2023

Thank you very much Rafik.
I understand it very well now.

Le mer. 15 févr. 2023 à 04:03, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Hi Kathy,
>
> Thanks for the questions.
> The working started discussion last December, meeting biweekly, and we are
> tasked basically to work on the measures for success and metrics for the
> applicant support program. We started first to review the tasks given by
> GNSO council in the initiation request for GGP, the relevant material like
> the applicant support recommendations report, relevant part of subpro final
> report and the implementation review report of the applicant
> support program. We have already delivert to the GNSO council the project
> plan and timeline .
> We are currently giving input/comment on the format and listing possible
> metrics following the applicant support program lifecycle element like
> outreach, submission or delegation. Discussion is moving slowly but
> starting to get its pace.
>
> We also had some presentations from the ICANN GDS division (Global Domains
> & Strategy) as they were responsible of implementation, about learnings
> from the applicant support program in the previous new gTLD round and also
> about the ODA (Operational Design Phase) for new subpro recommendations. It
> is acknowledged that the ICANN board will likely make decisions based on
> the ODA report for subpro before GGP delivers its recommendations. However,
> the GNSO council will submit the GGP recommendations report when it's done
> and approved to the ICANN board for consideration.
>
> sharing here the tasks requested to the GGP working group for reference:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Task 3 – Analyze the set of suggested metrics in Implementation Guidance
> 17.9and propose which ones should be prioritized. The set of prioritized
> metrics isNOT limited to what is identified in 17.9 Task 4 – Identify any
> other appropriate metrics and measures of success to helpin identifying the
> necessary program elements and measuring program successafter the fact. In
> identifying the suggested set of metrics, propose how data can becollected,
> how metrics can be measured, who can collect the data, as well as
> whatrepresents success. Task 5 – Consider, and to the extent feasible,
> suggest how the “outreach,education, business case development, and
> application evaluation” elements ofthe Applicant Support Program may be
> impacted by the identified metrics andmeasures of success. For example,
> based on the success metrics for Awarenessand Education, this may impact
> the approach for performing outreach andeducation. To the extent feasible,
> suggest an approach to outreach, education,business case development, and
> application evaluation assistance.*
>
>
> happy to answer further questions.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le mar. 14 févr. 2023 à 22:05, Kathy Kleiman <Kathy at kathykleiman.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Tx Rafik for doing this.  Can you tell us what is happening on this
>> important group?
>>
>> Best, Kathy
>> On 2/14/2023 2:34 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> For information, I am the NCSG representative to the GGP applicant
>> support working group.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> Le mar. 14 févr. 2023 à 15:24, Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Dear NCUC members,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:49 PM Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear NCUC members,
>>>>
>>>> On behalf of Mike Silber, GGP Working Group Chair, please find below
>>>> the GGP Applicant Support Subject Matter Expert Input Request
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As you may recall, the GNSO Council has approved
>>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+2022-08-25>
>>>>
>>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+2022-08-25>the
>>>> GNSO Guidance Process (GGP) Initiation Request
>>>> <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2022/draft/draft-subpro-ggp-initiation-request-clean-24aug22-en.pdf>
>>>> to perform work on Applicant Support. The GGP Working Group is beginning
>>>> its work with Task 2: “identify experts with expertise to aid in tasks 3,
>>>> 4, and 5” (see pages 3-5 of the Initiation Request). The GGP Initiation
>>>> Request envisioned that the Working Group has the flexibility/discretion to
>>>> rely on the advice of Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) in specific fields to
>>>> aid in deliberations for certain tasks pertaining to Task 3, 4, and 5 as
>>>> detailed in the Initiation Request. But the Initiation Request also listed
>>>> related experience and skills GGP Working Group members should have,
>>>> suggesting a possible overlap between GGP members and SMEs. Thus, it may be
>>>> that your organization has already appointed members to the GGP Working
>>>> Group that you consider SMEs based on this guidance from the Initiation
>>>> Request:
>>>>
>>>> *Organizations are encouraged to appoint individuals with skills,
>>>> knowledge and experience pertinent to forming an effective Applicant
>>>> Support Program. Council will provide guidance on the aggregated skill set
>>>> that is needed for the group (for example: grant and reviewing, regional
>>>> DNS participation, DNS marketplace economics, cost-benefit analyses, TLD
>>>> operations, DNS cybersecurity, and TLD investment).*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The GGP hereby requests that, if applicable, your organization suggest
>>>> SMEs by responding to gnsosecs at icann.org. If your organization is
>>>> participating in the GGP and your representative member is already an SME
>>>> please also let us know. If you are not participating in the GGP and not
>>>> suggesting SMEs it would be very helpful if you could respond accordingly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kindly reply to this email if you are a subject matter expert willing
>>>> to join the WG.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> Benjamin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing listNcuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.orghttps://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20230215/d516a048/attachment.htm>