[NCUC-DISCUSS] Troika merge proposal

Carlos Afonso ca at cafonso.ca
Sun Jul 12 14:05:53 CEST 2020


Hi Joly,  exactly like the CSG structurally, so no reason to lose weight. To the contrary, more effective than the current dispersion in three groups supposedly with the same general objective: defending the interests of the diverse non-commercial community.

fraternal regards

--c.a.

On 12/07/2020 02:55, Joly MacFie wrote:
> I'm something of a lurker myself, but it would seem to me that merging the
> three constituencies would mean that the NCSG would be no longer a group,
> but just a constituency itself, and thus would lose weight.
>
> While at the same time the NCUC would lose the ability to speak with a
> collective voice on such occasions it might differ from NPOC or whoever.
>
> I could be mistaken but I seem to recall the main justification for NPOC
> forming was a similar concern, mainly because they had different views over
> trademarks issues.
>
> joly
>
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 1:06 AM Joy Liddicoat <joy at liddicoat.nz> wrote:
>
>> Hi Joly - good question, thanks.  To be honest, I have no intention of
>> responding to the debate at this point - the idea generates about as much
>> interest as I would have in sharpening a blunt pencil and using it to poke
>> holes in cheese.
>>
>> No disrespect intended to those who favour discussing it, but honestly,
>> with all the other issues in the DNS+ world right now, I would have thought
>> better to engage in substantive policy work than on this kind of internal
>> restructuring.
>>
>> I acknowledge that I say this as someone who hasn't engaged in policy work
>> for some time (for various reasons) and also being from New Zealand, where
>> we currently have the privilege of living in a Covid-free community thanks
>> to our strong political leadership and collective community action.
>> However, this does give me a different perspective on ICANN, gTLDs, ccTLDs
>> and relative priorities.
>>
>> Joy Liddicoat
>> On 12/07/2020 3:59 pm, Joly MacFie wrote:
>>
>> I notice a deafeniing silence from the NCUC old school on this topic. Are
>> we keeping our powder dry?
>>
>> joly
>>
>> --
>> --------------------------------------
>> Joly MacFie  +2185659365
>> --------------------------------------
>> -
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing listNcuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.orghttps://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>> --
>> Joy Liddicoat
>> @internetrights
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

-- 

Carlos A. Afonso
[emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em contrário]
[emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise]

Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br
ISOC-BR - https://isoc.org.br


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20200712/47465fdc/attachment.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list