From benakin at gmail.com Wed Apr 1 21:22:30 2020 From: benakin at gmail.com (Benjamin Akinmoyeje) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 21:22:30 +0200 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Virtual Meetings Strategy - Reply by April 2nd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Chair, Please find below my response in yellow and underline. Kind regards, Benjamin On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:30 PM Bruna Martins dos Santos < bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear NCUC, > > I hope this email finds everyone well and at their houses. > > ICANN is starting a consultation with Community leaders on an effective > Virtual Meetings strategy past the first experience that was ICANN 67. > While it is still not confirmed by them whether the Kuala Lumpur > meeting will be a virtual one, considering the unstable conditions of > COVID-19 I believe we can already count this upcoming meeting as such. > > In light of that, as mentioned above, ICANN wants to hear back from > communities our position on Virtual meetings and what should be their > strategy moving forward. All community leaders have until Thursday, april > 2nd, to send the Org our positions on twelve multiple choice questions > related to known areas of concern such as, time zones, meeting duration, > and language services. > > In order to have our PoVs on this matter as constituency broad as > possible, I will copy the survey questions below and would appreciate if > you can comment on them by April 2nd, 10 AM UTC. > > We have previously collected comments on some issues with the app and > timezones, but I would like to ask you once again if - besides the > questions below - are there other points or issues you would like NCUC > leadership to point out in the survey. > > Best Regards, > -- > *Bruna Martins dos Santos * > NCUC Chair > > --- > > *Questions: * > > *Time Zone and Duration * > > *1. For ICANN67, the virtual meeting was conducted during general working > hours in Cancún local time. If ICANN68 is held as a Virtual Policy Forum, > what time zone should the schedule adhere to? * > Kuala Lumpur (UTC+8) > *London (UTC+1) * > Los Angeles (UTC-7) > No Preference > Other > > *2. What is the maximum number of hours per day you would participate in a > virtual ICANN68?* > > 8 hours/day > 6 hours/day > *4 hours/day * > 2 hours/day > No Preference > > *3. Would you support extending the duration of the meeting to accommodate > fewer hours per day? * > > No (keep current duration) > Yes (1 day) > *Yes (up to 2 days) * > Yes (up to 3 days) > No Preference > > *Program and Services * > *4. Would you support cross-community led plenary sessions during the > meeting?* > > *Yes* > No > > *5. Given the success of the Public Forum during ICANN67, would you > support a Public Forum during ICANN68 to facilitate interaction with the > ICANN Board?* > > *Yes * > No > > *6. How important is it to have interpretation services during the virtual > meeting?* > > *Very Important * > Important > Not very Important > Not at all Important > > *7. Rate the Importance of each language (1 to 5, with 1 being very > important and 5 being not important at all) * > > Arabic > Chinese > French > Portuguese > Russian > Spanish > > *I believe all languages are important. * > > _______________________________________________ > Ncuc-discuss mailing list > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bruna.mrtns at gmail.com Thu Apr 9 21:28:12 2020 From: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com (Bruna Martins dos Santos) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 16:28:12 -0300 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Virtual Meetings Strategy - Reply by April 2nd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear all, Thanks for the replies to this initial thread. You probably might have seen it but the Org has just announced ICANN68 as a remote meeting: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2020-04-09-en. In the meantime, they have also sent us another survey about this upcoming meeting that I would appreciate if we could discuss about. -- *ICANN Virtual Meeting Survey (2) Questions* *1. Do you support a virtual ICANN68 that focuses on key plenary and cross-community engagements, with an alternative schedule for working group meetings?* Answer Options: Yes / No / Other (Please Explain) *2. Please indicate which of the following cross-community plenary topics you support to be held as virtual sessions.* - The Domain Name Services Marketplace: Market Dynamics, Business Models, and Commercial Drivers - The Domain Name System and the Internet of Things: Opportunities, Risks, and Challenges - DNS Abuse - Voluntary Practices / Best Practices Beyond Policies and Contractual Requirements - ICANN Public Forum - Q&A with ICANN Org Executive Team Answer Options for each topic: Hold Session at ICANN68 / Postpone until ICANN69 / No Preference *3. Are there other topics that should be included as potential virtual sessions?* Answer Options: Yes / No (If Yes, Please Explain) *4. What dates should cross-community plenaries be scheduled?* Answer Options: During the original dates for ICANN68 (22-25 June) During the original dates for ICANN68 (22-25 June) + Friday, 26 June Weekly (Spread out) Other (Please Explain) *5. What is the maximum number of cross-community plenary sessions you would participate in per day?* Answer Options: 1 session/day 2 sessions/day 1 session/week 2 sessions/week Other (Please Explain) *6. Do you think ICANN should take any other actions to progress work related to ICANN68?* Answer Options: Yes / No (If Yes, Please Explain) Best Regards, Bruna Santos Le mer. 1 avr. 2020 à 16:22, Benjamin Akinmoyeje a écrit : > Dear Chair, > Please find below my response in yellow and underline. > > Kind regards, > Benjamin > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:30 PM Bruna Martins dos Santos < > bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear NCUC, >> >> I hope this email finds everyone well and at their houses. >> >> ICANN is starting a consultation with Community leaders on an effective >> Virtual Meetings strategy past the first experience that was ICANN 67. >> While it is still not confirmed by them whether the Kuala Lumpur >> meeting will be a virtual one, considering the unstable conditions of >> COVID-19 I believe we can already count this upcoming meeting as such. >> >> In light of that, as mentioned above, ICANN wants to hear back from >> communities our position on Virtual meetings and what should be their >> strategy moving forward. All community leaders have until Thursday, april >> 2nd, to send the Org our positions on twelve multiple choice questions >> related to known areas of concern such as, time zones, meeting duration, >> and language services. >> >> In order to have our PoVs on this matter as constituency broad as >> possible, I will copy the survey questions below and would appreciate if >> you can comment on them by April 2nd, 10 AM UTC. >> >> We have previously collected comments on some issues with the app and >> timezones, but I would like to ask you once again if - besides the >> questions below - are there other points or issues you would like NCUC >> leadership to point out in the survey. >> >> Best Regards, >> -- >> *Bruna Martins dos Santos * >> NCUC Chair >> >> --- >> >> *Questions: * >> >> *Time Zone and Duration * >> >> *1. For ICANN67, the virtual meeting was conducted during general working >> hours in Cancún local time. If ICANN68 is held as a Virtual Policy Forum, >> what time zone should the schedule adhere to? * >> Kuala Lumpur (UTC+8) >> *London (UTC+1) * >> Los Angeles (UTC-7) >> No Preference >> Other >> >> *2. What is the maximum number of hours per day you would participate in >> a virtual ICANN68?* >> >> 8 hours/day >> 6 hours/day >> *4 hours/day * >> 2 hours/day >> No Preference >> >> *3. Would you support extending the duration of the meeting to >> accommodate fewer hours per day? * >> >> No (keep current duration) >> Yes (1 day) >> *Yes (up to 2 days) * >> Yes (up to 3 days) >> No Preference >> >> *Program and Services * >> *4. Would you support cross-community led plenary sessions during the >> meeting?* >> >> *Yes* >> No >> >> *5. Given the success of the Public Forum during ICANN67, would you >> support a Public Forum during ICANN68 to facilitate interaction with the >> ICANN Board?* >> >> *Yes * >> No >> >> *6. How important is it to have interpretation services during the >> virtual meeting?* >> >> *Very Important * >> Important >> Not very Important >> Not at all Important >> >> *7. Rate the Importance of each language (1 to 5, with 1 being very >> important and 5 being not important at all) * >> >> Arabic >> Chinese >> French >> Portuguese >> Russian >> Spanish >> >> *I believe all languages are important. * > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ncuc-discuss mailing list >> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org >> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss >> > -- *Bruna Martins dos Santos * Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos @boomartins -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From romicabrera83 at gmail.com Fri Apr 10 00:23:19 2020 From: romicabrera83 at gmail.com (romina florencia Cabrera) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 19:23:19 -0300 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Virtual Meetings Strategy - Reply by April 2nd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Virtual meetings are a great complement, even after the post crisis, due to time or economic issues. At your command and to always serve you. El jue., 9 abr. 2020 a las 16:28, Bruna Martins dos Santos (< bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>) escribió: > Dear all, > > Thanks for the replies to this initial thread. You probably might have > seen it but the Org has just announced ICANN68 as a remote meeting: > https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2020-04-09-en. > > In the meantime, they have also sent us another survey about this upcoming > meeting that I would appreciate if we could discuss about. > > -- > > *ICANN Virtual Meeting Survey (2) Questions* > > > > *1. Do you support a virtual ICANN68 that focuses on key plenary and > cross-community engagements, with an alternative schedule for working group > meetings?* > > > > Answer Options: Yes / No / Other (Please Explain) > > > > *2. Please indicate which of the following cross-community plenary topics > you support to be held as virtual sessions.* > > - The Domain Name Services Marketplace: Market Dynamics, Business Models, > and Commercial Drivers > > - The Domain Name System and the Internet of Things: Opportunities, Risks, > and Challenges > > - DNS Abuse > > - Voluntary Practices / Best Practices Beyond Policies and Contractual > Requirements > > - ICANN Public Forum > > - Q&A with ICANN Org Executive Team > > > > Answer Options for each topic: Hold Session at ICANN68 / Postpone until > ICANN69 / No Preference > > > > *3. Are there other topics that should be included as potential virtual > sessions?* > > > > Answer Options: Yes / No (If Yes, Please Explain) > > > > *4. What dates should cross-community plenaries be scheduled?* > > > > Answer Options: > > During the original dates for ICANN68 (22-25 June) > > During the original dates for ICANN68 (22-25 June) + Friday, 26 June > > Weekly (Spread out) > > Other (Please Explain) > > > > *5. What is the maximum number of cross-community plenary sessions you > would participate in per day?* > > > > Answer Options: > > 1 session/day > > 2 sessions/day > > 1 session/week > > 2 sessions/week > > Other (Please Explain) > > > > *6. Do you think ICANN should take any other actions to progress work > related to ICANN68?* > > > > Answer Options: Yes / No (If Yes, Please Explain) > > Best Regards, > Bruna Santos > > > > Le mer. 1 avr. 2020 à 16:22, Benjamin Akinmoyeje a > écrit : > >> Dear Chair, >> Please find below my response in yellow and underline. >> >> Kind regards, >> Benjamin >> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:30 PM Bruna Martins dos Santos < >> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Dear NCUC, >>> >>> I hope this email finds everyone well and at their houses. >>> >>> ICANN is starting a consultation with Community leaders on an effective >>> Virtual Meetings strategy past the first experience that was ICANN 67. >>> While it is still not confirmed by them whether the Kuala Lumpur >>> meeting will be a virtual one, considering the unstable conditions of >>> COVID-19 I believe we can already count this upcoming meeting as such. >>> >>> In light of that, as mentioned above, ICANN wants to hear back from >>> communities our position on Virtual meetings and what should be their >>> strategy moving forward. All community leaders have until Thursday, april >>> 2nd, to send the Org our positions on twelve multiple choice questions >>> related to known areas of concern such as, time zones, meeting duration, >>> and language services. >>> >>> In order to have our PoVs on this matter as constituency broad as >>> possible, I will copy the survey questions below and would appreciate if >>> you can comment on them by April 2nd, 10 AM UTC. >>> >>> We have previously collected comments on some issues with the app and >>> timezones, but I would like to ask you once again if - besides the >>> questions below - are there other points or issues you would like NCUC >>> leadership to point out in the survey. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> -- >>> *Bruna Martins dos Santos * >>> NCUC Chair >>> >>> --- >>> >>> *Questions: * >>> >>> *Time Zone and Duration * >>> >>> *1. For ICANN67, the virtual meeting was conducted during general >>> working hours in Cancún local time. If ICANN68 is held as a Virtual Policy >>> Forum, what time zone should the schedule adhere to? * >>> Kuala Lumpur (UTC+8) >>> *London (UTC+1) * >>> Los Angeles (UTC-7) >>> No Preference >>> Other >>> >>> *2. What is the maximum number of hours per day you would participate in >>> a virtual ICANN68?* >>> >>> 8 hours/day >>> 6 hours/day >>> *4 hours/day * >>> 2 hours/day >>> No Preference >>> >>> *3. Would you support extending the duration of the meeting to >>> accommodate fewer hours per day? * >>> >>> No (keep current duration) >>> Yes (1 day) >>> *Yes (up to 2 days) * >>> Yes (up to 3 days) >>> No Preference >>> >>> *Program and Services * >>> *4. Would you support cross-community led plenary sessions during the >>> meeting?* >>> >>> *Yes* >>> No >>> >>> *5. Given the success of the Public Forum during ICANN67, would you >>> support a Public Forum during ICANN68 to facilitate interaction with the >>> ICANN Board?* >>> >>> *Yes * >>> No >>> >>> *6. How important is it to have interpretation services during the >>> virtual meeting?* >>> >>> *Very Important * >>> Important >>> Not very Important >>> Not at all Important >>> >>> *7. Rate the Importance of each language (1 to 5, with 1 being very >>> important and 5 being not important at all) * >>> >>> Arabic >>> Chinese >>> French >>> Portuguese >>> Russian >>> Spanish >>> >>> *I believe all languages are important. * >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list >>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org >>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss >>> >> > > -- > *Bruna Martins dos Santos * > > Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos > @boomartins > _______________________________________________ > Ncuc-discuss mailing list > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From suhaidi.hassan.my at gmail.com Fri Apr 10 02:57:27 2020 From: suhaidi.hassan.my at gmail.com (Suhaidi Hassan) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 08:57:27 +0800 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] [At-Large] ICANN68 to be a virtual meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9B4E0BCA-9825-49D6-BFEB-AF86BF7CB4A5@gmail.com> Dear Maureen and all, On behalf of the ICANN68 host committee, I respect and understand this decision, although (and, honestly) it's a difficult one for us to accept. We understand the decision was ultimately made that prioritises the health and safety of our ICANN community, the international guests travelling to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and, most importantly, mitigates the risk of spreading the Covid-19. Our sympathies at this time are with those affected by Covid-19 all around the world. We hope ICANN would consider Kuala Lumpur again as host of ICANN meeting in the future. Thank you, Kind regards, Suhaidi Hassan ISOC Malaysia Chapter > On 10 Apr 2020, at 2:29 AM, Maureen Hilyard wrote: > > https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2020-04-09-en > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sb at inapp.com Fri Apr 10 05:32:34 2020 From: sb at inapp.com (Satish Babu) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 09:02:34 +0530 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] [At-Large] ICANN68 to be a virtual meeting In-Reply-To: References: <9B4E0BCA-9825-49D6-BFEB-AF86BF7CB4A5@gmail.com> Message-ID: Dear Suhaidi and all, As others have mentioned in this thread, this was expected, and there was little anyone could do differently. Nevertheless, it's a loss for our region, and would have been particularly bad for Suhaidi and his team in KL. I appreciate all the work done by Suhaidi & team, and sincerely hope that sometime in the future, after COVID-19 is just a distant, bad memory, we will go back to KL. Stay safe, With kind regards, satish On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:35 AM Laxmi Yadav wrote: > Good decision, but very sad > Laxmi Prasad Yadav > Nepal d > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 10, 2020, at 6:42 AM, Suhaidi Hassan > wrote: > > Dear Maureen and all, > > On behalf of the ICANN68 host committee, I respect and understand this > decision, although (and, honestly) it's a difficult one for us to accept. > > We understand the decision was ultimately made that prioritises the health > and safety of our ICANN community, the international guests travelling to > Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and, most importantly, mitigates the risk of > spreading the Covid-19. > > Our sympathies at this time are with those affected by Covid-19 all around > the world. > > We hope ICANN would consider Kuala Lumpur again as host of ICANN meeting > in the future. > > Thank you, > > Kind regards, > > Suhaidi Hassan > ISOC Malaysia Chapter > > > > On 10 Apr 2020, at 2:29 AM, Maureen Hilyard > wrote: > > https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2020-04-09-en > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your > personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance > with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and > the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can > visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or > configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or > disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. > > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your > personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance > with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and > the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can > visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or > configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or > disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your > personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance > with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and > the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can > visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or > configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or > disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bruna.mrtns at gmail.com Tue Apr 14 15:40:26 2020 From: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com (Bruna Martins dos Santos) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:40:26 -0300 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN 68 organization efforts - Survey Message-ID: Dear all, This is the second part of the survey related to the ICANN68 organization efforts we - Steph, Joan and myself - are supposed to present answers to at the SOAC Leaders call tomorrow. Besides the issues below, theres still a few things we could comment on such as the length of the meeting - usual 4/5 days, add 2 days at the end, or any other possible option -, the timezone it will adopt - we have community leaders pointing out to CET or KL time as options -, and reinforce the need for improved translations services and so on. Thanks to everyone who presented us answers so far, we really appreciate it. But in case you still want to point something else on this subject, feel free to answer to this email! Best regards, Bruna Santos ----- *ICANN Virtual Meeting Survey (2) Questions* *1. Do you support a virtual ICANN68 that focuses on key plenary and cross-community engagements, with an alternative schedule for working group meetings?* Answer Options: Yes / No / Other (Please Explain) *2. Please indicate which of the following cross-community plenary topics you support to be held as virtual sessions.* - The Domain Name Services Marketplace: Market Dynamics, Business Models, and Commercial Drivers - The Domain Name System and the Internet of Things: Opportunities, Risks, and Challenges - DNS Abuse - Voluntary Practices / Best Practices Beyond Policies and Contractual Requirements - ICANN Public Forum - Q&A with ICANN Org Executive Team Answer Options for each topic: Hold Session at ICANN68 / Postpone until ICANN69 / No Preference *3. Are there other topics that should be included as potential virtual sessions?* Answer Options: Yes / No (If Yes, Please Explain) *4. What dates should cross-community plenaries be scheduled?* Answer Options: During the original dates for ICANN68 (22-25 June) During the original dates for ICANN68 (22-25 June) + Friday, 26 June Weekly (Spread out) Other (Please Explain) *5. What is the maximum number of cross-community plenary sessions you would participate in per day?* Answer Options: 1 session/day 2 sessions/day 1 session/week 2 sessions/week Other (Please Explain) *6. Do you think ICANN should take any other actions to progress work related to ICANN68?* Answer Options: Yes / No (If Yes, Please Explain) -- *Bruna Martins dos Santos * Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos @boomartins -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bruna.mrtns at gmail.com Tue Apr 21 19:22:47 2020 From: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com (Bruna Martins dos Santos) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:22:47 -0300 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: FYI ICANN Announces Webinar to Discuss New Projections Based on Impact of COVID-19 In-Reply-To: References: <05335122-2283-4592-8877-2F1889F1FA8C@icann.org> Message-ID: FYI. ---------- Forwarded message --------- De : Maryam Bakoshi Date: mar. 21 avr. 2020 à 08:07 Subject: FYI ICANN Announces Webinar to Discuss New Projections Based on Impact of COVID-19 To: Dear ICANN Community, ICANN’s Planning Team would like to invite you to attend a webinar to discuss the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ICANN org’s current and planned work. ICANN org has recently developed new projections in ICANN’s Revised Draft FY21-25 Operating and Financial Plan and Revised Draft FY21 Operating Plan and Budget, which will be presented during the webinars for information and discussion and will be proposed for adoption by the ICANN Board in early May. Please join one of the two scheduled informational webinars on 28 April 2020 to learn more about the impact of COVID-19 on ICANN’s planned work as detailed in the Revised Draft FY21-25 Operating and Financial Plan and Revised Draft FY21 Operating Plan and Budget. ICANN welcomes the community’s questions and comments. Below are the details for the two sessions. If you are unable to participate in one of these sessions, they will be recorded and posted to the community wiki for future viewing and additional questions. It is not necessary to attend both sessions, each session will cover the same material. We are hosting two sessions to better accommodate time zones. *Webinar #1* 28 April 2020 *15:00-16:30 UTC* Remote Participation: https://icann.zoom.us/j/95689685323?pwd=YWdWK1VNZnJsVEVaeFpha05zN0t1QT09 [icann.zoom.us] *Webinar #2* 28 April 2020 *23:00-00:30 UTC* Remote Participation: https://icann.zoom.us/j/99482978256?pwd=RUJyZU9USzFjOTA0dWcwOVNWY2ZqZz09 [icann.zoom.us] *Community Wiki* *Link to Recordings (Once they become available.)* https://community.icann.org/display/projfinadhocws/FY21+Budget+Webinars We look forward to your participation and invite you to share this information with other community members who would like to be informed on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ICANN’s current and planned work. Thank you, The ICANN Planning Team _______________________________________________ Gnso-sc-budget mailing list Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-sc-budget _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwICAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=dsNEm-29fVxUZkAcNo6uVFSuR908xVUpIzw1SYDvqPk&s=PGler8mDw5pjkrWH4Wln11iRAS9biFG_jRMf4hPA2Nw&e= ) and the website Terms of Service ( https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_tos&d=DwICAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=dsNEm-29fVxUZkAcNo6uVFSuR908xVUpIzw1SYDvqPk&s=_m8pz1qo2Sskooi7yrVYA5dfJ3d8aH8RihhZZ4tj6Ok&e= ). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. -- *Bruna Martins dos Santos * Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos @boomartins -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bruna.mrtns at gmail.com Fri Apr 24 07:50:29 2020 From: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com (Bruna Martins dos Santos) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 02:50:29 -0300 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC webinar - Policy Writing Course for Non-native Speakers Message-ID: Dear NCUC, First of all I hope you are doing well and are safe during this pandemics. I also do hope it all goes away very soon and we manage through it. On another note, some good news - NCUC Leadership team has been working on a second webinar for the Policy Writing course. As we mentioned before, this one will have the specific target on developing skills on our members that are also Non-native speakers. We are aiming for this webinar to take place on the second half of may - we are aiming for the week between 25th and 29th - and the idea here will be to build up on the knowledge shared on our initial Policy Writing Icann Learn Course and deep dive into strategies, tips and communications challenges some of us - non-native speakers - might face when attempting to work on a Policy statement, public comment or anything of the sort. Therefore, I would like to ask you two things: *1. Is there interest in taking part of this course ? If so, I would like you to reply to this email - offlist - confirming your attendance. *(Tentative week is 25-29th of may, date is yet TBD) *2. Is there any questions of topics you would like to see on this course ? Any doubts or current concerns that can better orient our shaping of this webinar are very much welcome. * I look forward to hearing back from you! Please, stay well and inside your homes - if possible. Best Regards, -- *Bruna Martins dos Santos * Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos @boomartins -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bruna.mrtns at gmail.com Fri Apr 24 08:11:31 2020 From: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com (Bruna Martins dos Santos) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 03:11:31 -0300 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] =?utf-8?q?ICANN_Org=E2=80=99s_Multifaceted_Respons?= =?utf-8?q?e_to_DNS_Abuse_-_CEO_Blog?= Message-ID: Dear NCUC, On a shorter note, I would like to share with you the recent blog post from ICANNs CEO on the Org's "Multifaceted Response to DNS Abuse": https://www.icann.org/news/blog/icann-org-s-multifaceted-response-to-dns-abuse The post refers to the March report from ICANN’s Domain Abuse Activity Reporting system that shows an increased occurrence of the use of COVID-19-related domain names for DNS Abuse as well as some malicious new online campaigns in times of the pandemics. The document also highlights some of the efforts being made by ICANN Compliance, GDD and OCTO. Happy reading! best, -- *Bruna Martins dos Santos * Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos @boomartins -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bruna.mrtns at gmail.com Fri Apr 24 08:12:12 2020 From: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com (Bruna Martins dos Santos) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 03:12:12 -0300 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: Consensus Playbook Published In-Reply-To: <642731F0-6643-4CD5-BCC9-E010BB36B6C4@icann.org> References: <642731F0-6643-4CD5-BCC9-E010BB36B6C4@icann.org> Message-ID: FYI ---------- Forwarded message --------- De : Maryam Bakoshi Date: jeu. 23 avr. 2020 à 06:26 Subject: Consensus Playbook Published To: *Consensus Playbook Published* Originated from GNSO’s Policy Development Process (PDP) 3.0 initiative and a subsequent Additional Budget Request (ABR), the *Consensus Playbook*has been completed for the ICANN community to reference and use. *The Consensus Playbook can be downloaded here: **http://go.icann.org/consensus* This playbook was developed by an external vendor (Consensus Building Institute - CBI.org ) via an Additional Budget Request (ABR) for FY20 submitted by the GNSO Council, based on PDP 3.0 improvements . The ICANN Boardapproved the ABR contingent upon the playbook being developed with *broad applicability across the community*, and not just limited to GNSO PDPs. Hence, this*Consensus Playbook* aims to provide community volunteers with practical tools and best practices for building consensus, bridging differences, and breaking deadlocks within ICANN processes beyond just GNSO working groups. In developing the playbook, CBI interviewed fourteen (14) ICANN community leaders across ICANN’s SOs and ACs, who shared their extensive consensus building experience in leading and participating in working groups and community groups. The playbook stresses that consensus building should be considered as a journey and it does not just take place at the end of a group’s deliberations. To that end, we’d like to draw your attention to Appendix A, which serves as a reference guide to help inform you which of the fifteen (15) “plays” are applicable to the various phases of the community’s work. It is important to note that this playbook does not seek to change the definition of consensus or the methods of decision making as prescribed in each community group’s rules and procedure; it does not seek to introduce any new requirements either.* It is designed for the ICANN community and is only permitted to be used by the ICANN community in support of ICANN related work. The playbook shall not be used for any non-ICANN related purposes.* All ICANN community volunteers are strongly encouraged to review the playbook. We anticipate additional opportunities for the ICANN community to discuss the contents and practical utility of the playbook. — Many thanks, *Maryam Bakoshi* | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator *ICANN* | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers *S*: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | *T*: ‭+44 7846 471777‬ -- *Bruna Martins dos Santos * Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos @boomartins -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bruna.mrtns at gmail.com Fri Apr 24 17:11:26 2020 From: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com (Bruna Martins dos Santos) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 12:11:26 -0300 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN68 - Final Survey - Cross-Community Sessions Message-ID: Dear NCUC, We have a new survey on the next ICANN Meeting, and this time they want to gather input on Cross-Community sessions. Feel free to add your answers and suggestions on this thread! ---- *Survey Questions:* 1. How many plenary sessions should we conduct during ICANN68? 1. Which topics (from the list presented on our last call) should run as non-conflicted plenary sessions during ICANN68? [Note: The Q&A with ICANN Org Executive Team has been removed from the list of potential topics as it will now be planned during Prep Week.] 1. Should ICANN announce the recipient of the 2020 Community Excellence Award during ICANN68, with the actual ceremony to take place at the next face-to-face ICANN Public Meeting? best, -- *Bruna Martins dos Santos * Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos @boomartins -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Mon Apr 27 12:52:22 2020 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 06:52:22 -0400 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] WEBCAST TODAY: ICANN Webinar for the Middle East: Understanding DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS (#DoH) Message-ID: Is DoT/DoH a good thing? The answer is definitively "it depends" - see Vittorio Bertola's presentation The DoH Dilemma from the 2019 DNS Symposium. While it boosts security and privacy locally, it may also put even more data in the hands of what Jay Sulzberger refers to as "the englobulators". It's potential to defeat state censorship and surveillance makes it a particularly sensitive issue in the Middle East. To learn more about DNS privacy, see the ISOC DNS Privacy FAQ ISOC Live posted: "On Monday 27 April 2020 at 13:00 UTC the Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) presents 'Webinar for the Middle East: Understanding DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS (DoH)'. Internet Hall of Fame Inductee Adiel Akplogan, ICANN Vi" [image: livestream] On *Monday 27 April 2020* at *13:00 UTC* the *Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers * (ICANN) presents '*Webinar for the Middle East: Understanding DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS (DoH) *'. Internet Hall of Fame Inductee* Adiel Akplogan *, ICANN Vice President of Technical Engagement. DoT and DoH are new IETF technical standards that transmit DNS enquiries over encrypted connections. *LIVESTREAM: http://livestream.com/internetsociety/icann * *PARTICIPATE: https://go.icann.org/3avh1KB * *TWITTER @ICANN + #DoH https://bit.ly/2YaZR2j * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/12004/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +2185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Mon Apr 27 16:30:21 2020 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:30:21 -0400 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] WEBCAST TODAY: ICANN Webinar for the Middle East: Understanding DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS (#DoH) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: DoH is sensitive to whom in the Middle East? The dictators I bet. of course DoH would be sensitive in the middle east because it can stop tyrants from censoring people (shivers). The speaker mentioned here is on a very one sided mission to fight with DoH. Having him as the only speaker and linking only to his presentation is unfair. But seems like he is not even the speaker, Adiel (ICANN staff member) is. So would be good to know what ICANN says. After all their employee (Someone else other than Adiel) was one of the co-authors of the RFC. On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 6:53 AM Joly MacFie wrote: > Is DoT/DoH a good thing? The answer is definitively "it depends" - > see Vittorio Bertola's presentation The DoH Dilemma > > from the 2019 DNS Symposium. While it boosts security and privacy locally, > it may also put even more data in the hands of what Jay Sulzberger refers > to as "the englobulators". It's potential to defeat state censorship and > surveillance makes it a particularly sensitive issue in the Middle East. > > To learn more about DNS privacy, see the ISOC DNS Privacy FAQ > > > ISOC Live posted: "On Monday 27 April 2020 at 13:00 UTC the Internet > Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) presents 'Webinar for > the Middle East: Understanding DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS > (DoH)'. Internet Hall of Fame Inductee Adiel Akplogan, ICANN Vi" > > [image: livestream] On *Monday > 27 April 2020* at *13:00 UTC* the *Internet Corporation For Assigned > Names and Numbers * (ICANN) presents '*Webinar for > the Middle East: Understanding DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS (DoH) > *'. Internet Hall of Fame Inductee* Adiel > Akplogan *, > ICANN Vice President of Technical Engagement. DoT and DoH are new IETF > technical standards that transmit DNS enquiries over encrypted connections. > > *LIVESTREAM: http://livestream.com/internetsociety/icann > * > > *PARTICIPATE: https://go.icann.org/3avh1KB * > > *TWITTER @ICANN + #DoH https://bit.ly/2YaZR2j * > > *Permalink* > https://isoc.live/12004/ > > > > - > > -- > -------------------------------------- > Joly MacFie +2185659365 > -------------------------------------- > - > _______________________________________________ > Ncuc-discuss mailing list > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss > -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From milton at gatech.edu Mon Apr 27 23:20:20 2020 From: milton at gatech.edu (Mueller, Milton L) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 21:20:20 +0000 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] WEBCAST TODAY: ICANN Webinar for the Middle East: Understanding DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS (#DoH) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Bertola is known to be an apologist for state sovereignty on the internet, which feed on the belief that national governments are pure and public interested protectors against the horrible platforms, and their deeply threatening advertisements. From: Ncuc-discuss On Behalf Of farzaneh badii Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 10:30 AM To: joly at punkcast.com Cc: NCUC-discuss Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] WEBCAST TODAY: ICANN Webinar for the Middle East: Understanding DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS (#DoH) DoH is sensitive to whom in the Middle East? The dictators I bet. of course DoH would be sensitive in the middle east because it can stop tyrants from censoring people (shivers). The speaker mentioned here is on a very one sided mission to fight with DoH. Having him as the only speaker and linking only to his presentation is unfair. But seems like he is not even the speaker, Adiel (ICANN staff member) is. So would be good to know what ICANN says. After all their employee (Someone else other than Adiel) was one of the co-authors of the RFC. On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 6:53 AM Joly MacFie > wrote: Is DoT/DoH a good thing? The answer is definitively "it depends" - see Vittorio Bertola's presentation The DoH Dilemma from the 2019 DNS Symposium. While it boosts security and privacy locally, it may also put even more data in the hands of what Jay Sulzberger refers to as "the englobulators". It's potential to defeat state censorship and surveillance makes it a particularly sensitive issue in the Middle East. To learn more about DNS privacy, see the ISOC DNS Privacy FAQ ISOC Live posted: "On Monday 27 April 2020 at 13:00 UTC the Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) presents 'Webinar for the Middle East: Understanding DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS (DoH)'. Internet Hall of Fame Inductee Adiel Akplogan, ICANN Vi" [Image removed by sender. livestream]On Monday 27 April 2020 at 13:00 UTC the Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) presents 'Webinar for the Middle East: Understanding DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS (DoH)'. Internet Hall of Fame Inductee Adiel Akplogan, ICANN Vice President of Technical Engagement. DoT and DoH are new IETF technical standards that transmit DNS enquiries over encrypted connections. LIVESTREAM: http://livestream.com/internetsociety/icann PARTICIPATE: https://go.icann.org/3avh1KB TWITTER @ICANN + #DoH https://bit.ly/2YaZR2j Permalink https://isoc.live/12004/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +2185659365 -------------------------------------- - _______________________________________________ Ncuc-discuss mailing list Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1700 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 332 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: From joly at punkcast.com Mon Apr 27 23:41:45 2020 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:41:45 -0400 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] WEBCAST TODAY: ICANN Webinar for the Middle East: Understanding DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS (#DoH) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Regardless of his outlook, I thought the presentation informative. Sufficiently to include it in my preamble. I have to admit I didn't glean that much more from the livestream. But I may review. joly On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 5:20 PM Mueller, Milton L wrote: > Bertola is known to be an apologist for state sovereignty on the internet, > which feed on the belief that national governments are pure and public > interested protectors against the horrible platforms, and their deeply > threatening advertisements. > > > > *From:* Ncuc-discuss *On Behalf Of *farzaneh > badii > *Sent:* Monday, April 27, 2020 10:30 AM > *To:* joly at punkcast.com > *Cc:* NCUC-discuss > *Subject:* Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] WEBCAST TODAY: ICANN Webinar for the Middle > East: Understanding DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS (#DoH) > > > > DoH is sensitive to whom in the Middle East? The dictators I bet. of > course DoH would be sensitive in the middle east because it can stop > tyrants from censoring people (shivers). > > The speaker mentioned here is on a very one sided mission to fight with > DoH. Having him as the only speaker and linking only to his presentation is > unfair. > > But seems like he is not even the speaker, Adiel (ICANN staff member) is. > So would be good to know what ICANN says. After all their employee (Someone > else other than Adiel) was one of the co-authors of the RFC. > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 6:53 AM Joly MacFie wrote: > > Is DoT/DoH a good thing? The answer is definitively "it depends" - > see Vittorio Bertola's presentation The DoH Dilemma > > from the 2019 DNS Symposium. While it boosts security and privacy locally, > it may also put even more data in the hands of what Jay Sulzberger refers > to as "the englobulators". It's potential to defeat state censorship and > surveillance makes it a particularly sensitive issue in the Middle East. > > > > To learn more about DNS privacy, see the ISOC DNS Privacy FAQ > > > > > ISOC Live posted: "On Monday 27 April 2020 at 13:00 UTC the Internet > Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) presents 'Webinar for > the Middle East: Understanding DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS > (DoH)'. Internet Hall of Fame Inductee Adiel Akplogan, ICANN Vi" > > [image: Image removed by sender. livestream] > On *Monday 27 April 2020* at *13:00 > UTC* the * Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers > * (ICANN) presents '*Webinar for the Middle East: > Understanding DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS (DoH) > *'. Internet Hall of Fame Inductee* Adiel > Akplogan *, > ICANN Vice President of Technical Engagement. DoT and DoH are new IETF > technical standards that transmit DNS enquiries over encrypted connections. > > *LIVESTREAM: http://livestream.com/internetsociety/icann > * > > *PARTICIPATE: https://go.icann.org/3avh1KB * > > *TWITTER @ICANN + #DoH https://bit.ly/2YaZR2j * > > > > *Permalink* > https://isoc.live/12004/ > > > > [image: Image removed by sender.][image: Image removed by sender.] > > > > > - > > > > -- > > -------------------------------------- > Joly MacFie +2185659365 > > -------------------------------------- > > - > > _______________________________________________ > Ncuc-discuss mailing list > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss > > -- > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > Ncuc-discuss mailing list > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss > -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +2185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1700 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 332 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bruna.mrtns at gmail.com Tue Apr 28 17:06:16 2020 From: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com (Bruna Martins dos Santos) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:06:16 -0300 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: FYI ICANN Announces Webinar to Discuss New Projections Based on Impact of COVID-19 In-Reply-To: References: <05335122-2283-4592-8877-2F1889F1FA8C@icann.org> Message-ID: Hey all, this webinar is starting just now! ---------- Forwarded message --------- De : Maryam Bakoshi Date: mar. 21 avr. 2020 à 08:07 Subject: FYI ICANN Announces Webinar to Discuss New Projections Based on Impact of COVID-19 To: Dear ICANN Community, ICANN’s Planning Team would like to invite you to attend a webinar to discuss the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ICANN org’s current and planned work. ICANN org has recently developed new projections in ICANN’s Revised Draft FY21-25 Operating and Financial Plan and Revised Draft FY21 Operating Plan and Budget, which will be presented during the webinars for information and discussion and will be proposed for adoption by the ICANN Board in early May. Please join one of the two scheduled informational webinars on 28 April 2020 to learn more about the impact of COVID-19 on ICANN’s planned work as detailed in the Revised Draft FY21-25 Operating and Financial Plan and Revised Draft FY21 Operating Plan and Budget. ICANN welcomes the community’s questions and comments. Below are the details for the two sessions. If you are unable to participate in one of these sessions, they will be recorded and posted to the community wiki for future viewing and additional questions. It is not necessary to attend both sessions, each session will cover the same material. We are hosting two sessions to better accommodate time zones. *Webinar #1* 28 April 2020 *15:00-16:30 UTC* Remote Participation: https://icann.zoom.us/j/95689685323?pwd=YWdWK1VNZnJsVEVaeFpha05zN0t1QT09 [icann.zoom.us] *Webinar #2* 28 April 2020 *23:00-00:30 UTC* Remote Participation: https://icann.zoom.us/j/99482978256?pwd=RUJyZU9USzFjOTA0dWcwOVNWY2ZqZz09 [icann.zoom.us] *Community Wiki* *Link to Recordings (Once they become available.)* https://community.icann.org/display/projfinadhocws/FY21+Budget+Webinars We look forward to your participation and invite you to share this information with other community members who would like to be informed on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ICANN’s current and planned work. Thank you, The ICANN Planning Team _______________________________________________ Gnso-sc-budget mailing list Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-sc-budget _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwICAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=dsNEm-29fVxUZkAcNo6uVFSuR908xVUpIzw1SYDvqPk&s=PGler8mDw5pjkrWH4Wln11iRAS9biFG_jRMf4hPA2Nw&e= ) and the website Terms of Service ( https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_tos&d=DwICAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=dsNEm-29fVxUZkAcNo6uVFSuR908xVUpIzw1SYDvqPk&s=_m8pz1qo2Sskooi7yrVYA5dfJ3d8aH8RihhZZ4tj6Ok&e= ). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. -- *Bruna Martins dos Santos * Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos @boomartins -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bruna.mrtns at gmail.com Thu Apr 30 22:54:38 2020 From: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com (Bruna Martins dos Santos) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:54:38 -0300 Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: [ICANN Community Leaders] 3 blogs relating to the ICANN Community and the Covid-19 Pandemic. In-Reply-To: <6FD24C33-BC22-4C40-9F65-97007B51B9ED@icann.org> References: <6FD24C33-BC22-4C40-9F65-97007B51B9ED@icann.org> Message-ID: FYI. ---------- Forwarded message --------- De : David Olive Date: jeu. 30 avr. 2020 à 17:43 Subject: [ICANN Community Leaders] 3 blogs relating to the ICANN Community and the Covid-19 Pandemic. To: so-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org Dear Community Leaders: For your information. Best regards. David - Supporting the Work of Our Global Community over the Next Few Months: Leveraging Remote Participation ICANN serves a global community. Face-to-face engagement and remote participation are integral to our work, and act as the primary forms of interaction for our stakeholders and community. However, the COVID-19 pandemic is challenging this notion. - ICANN Community Priorities and the COVID-19 Pandemic Earlier this year, Supporting Organization (SO) and Advisory Committee ( AC) leaders met to outline their priorities for 2020. This exercise provided a starting point for current discussions about prioritizing ICANNcommunity work in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. - Prioritizing the Board’s Work and Goals During COVID-19 As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to disrupt our daily lives, more and more people are turning to the Internet to connect with friends and families, conduct business, and stay up-to-date with the latest information. Sent from my iPhone David A. Olive Senior Vice President Policy Development Support Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) _______________________________________________ SO-AC-SG-CLeaders mailing list SO-AC-SG-CLeaders at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. -- *Bruna Martins dos Santos * Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos @boomartins -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: