[NCUC-DISCUSS] David and his many positions at NCUC/NCSG/NPOC
James Gannon
james at cyberinvasion.net
Wed Oct 10 07:21:47 CEST 2018
I have to agree here, with full knowledge and information the votes were cast and the members as a collective decided that they wanted David in this role, that should be the end of the discussion in my opinion.
> On 10 Oct 2018, at 06:42, Ron Wickersham <rjw at ITSMYINTERNET.ORG> wrote:
>
>
> Now that the electcion results are in, the campaign is over.
>
> Ayden and farzaneh, you both spoke passionately about your position on
> the David Cake nomination and standing for election.
>
> Both of you (and a few others) spoke passionately about your concerns
> and displeasure with the situation. This is ok during a campaign
> as candidates and their supporters and distractors speak to persuade
> the voters.
>
> but the voters have now spoken.
>
> is it disrespectful of the membership and their voting decision to
> continue this "campaign" against one of our duly elected members.
>
> please, both of you consider acceptiting the wisdom of the voters
> and work to bring harmony now to the elected parties who assume their
> new positions.
>
>
> respectfully,
>
> -ron
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list