[NCUC-DISCUSS] IGF Workshop Discussion List

[Ayden Férdeline]

Thanks for sharing these proposals. I just had one quick comment; I think any workshop that the NCUC (or the NCSG) proposes should be related in some way to the Domain Name System, as it is our mission to amplify the voice of individuals and civil society organisations in the development of the Domain Name System and this area of the Internet’s infrastructure. We do have a limited mission. I do appreciate that the larger Internet ecosystem has risks to the Domain Name System and ICANN’s mission and activities, however I worry that looking at the outcomes from Plenipot, as interesting as this would be, might lead us a little bit away from our narrow area of expertise. But it's great to get ideas rolling in, so thanks for starting this conversation!

Best wishes,
Ayden Férdeline

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On 20 May 2018 11:42 PM, Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:

> Proposal 1 could focus on the outcomes of the upcoming ITU Plenipotenciary 2018 meeting and its effects (if any new one comes) on the Internet Governance discussions and also talk a little bit about these discussions not being exclusively related to Governmental Public Policies, what would justify bringing these issues to ITU for some countries, and preaching the MS model for its democratic values.
>
> Thanks for sending ideas here, Michael! If anyone else wants to chime in, you're all welcome.
>
> Best,
> Bruna
>
> 2018-05-20 16:06 GMT-03:00 Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks to all those who volunteered to help take this discussion forward. I would suggest two possible topics for our session proposal:
>>
>> 1. Multistakeholderism: Rights, domain names, and governmental impacts on Internet governance. The challenge to doing this would be to craft a proposal which is sufficiently different from the NCSG proposal which Ayden circulated. Still - I think there is potentially space to do this, for example by focusing on how this has been evolving at ITU, with their recent resolution (Res 102 ITU-D) on internet resources.
>>
>> 2. "Whither WHOIS - Accreditation and the Path Forward for the Global WHOIS" - By IGF 2018, we'll be six months out from the GDPR's "Judgment Day", and potentially around six months in to the proposed expedited PDP to develop an accreditation model for access, so a good time to check in on progress, and how the sky didn't actually fall on May 26, and the future of the WHOIS.
>>
>> So - do we want option 1 or option 2 (or a third option)? Thoughts?
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> [ NCUC IGF WS Proposal](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kgxchiYlh56OCQYblbxl-yO_BzsXQeOYVxoPXgwcaos/edit?usp=drive_web)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
> --
> Bruna Martins dos Santos
>
> +55 61 99252-6512
> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> @boomartins
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20180521/1b3c20b0/attachment.html>