[NCUC-DISCUSS] RightsCon Session Update

[Michael Karanicolas]

Great to hear! Thanks for volunteering. I'll be back in touch when we get
closer to RightsCon, as the schedule becomes available. If anyone else is
interested, please don't hesitate to let me know.

Best,

Michael

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:33 AM, Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Michael,
>
> Thanks for pulling this together for us.
>
> I am planning to attend RightsCon and will be happy to spend sometime in
> our booth. I also look forward to attending this session and hope we will
> be able to point out that in many countries and groups such as ICANN, MS is
> dying because of Gov’s overreaching power. And this needs to change if we
> want to save this model in the IG space.
>
> Regards,
> Arsene
>
> -----------------
> Arsène Tungali,
> about.me/ArseneTungali
> +243 993810967
> GPG: 523644A0
> Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
>
> Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)
>
> > On Mar 7, 2018, at 6:16 PM, Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks very much for that. You have it spot on regarding the challenge
> > with private sector engagement. Negotiations on the speakers' list
> > have actually been a bit more delicate than I had anticipated, with a
> > lot of pushback from UNESCO on things being too American-centric, but
> > I have reached out to Rachel to chat about the session, so thanks very
> > much for the suggestion.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 6:44 AM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the update. Just on the panellists — Susan left Facebook last
> >> March, so it might be advisable to find someone else (with her change in
> >> affiliation I don't think she will be attending RightsCon). I guess the
> >> challenge here is that the private sector does not engage as much in
> >> RightsCon as civil society does, so trying to find private sector
> speakers
> >> already going, or with a desire to attend and to speak on this topic, is
> >> going to be challenging.
> >>
> >> That said, any chance we can extend an invitation to Rachel Pollack to
> >> speak? I'm not sure if she can attend, but she is an NCUC member who
> works
> >> for UNESCO and is very knowledgeable on this (and other) topics.
> >>
> >> Ayden
> >>
> >>
> >> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> >> On 6 March 2018 1:56 PM, Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Just writing with an update on the NCUC RightsCon session. As I
> mentioned
> >> last month, the proposal has been accepted. The RightsCon folks
> followed up
> >> requesting that we collaborate with UNESCO on it, merging our session
> with
> >> one they had proposed based on last year's publication on
> >> multistakeholderism. As a result, the session will now be co-moderated
> by
> >> Xianhong Hu, alongside myself, but the session description, structure,
> and
> >> speakers are basically unchanged from the version we submitted. I am
> >> attaching our revised description below, along with initial the list of
> >> proposed panelists. Happy to hear any thoughts or feedback.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >> PS: Our NCUC outreach booth for RightsCon has also been approved. No
> details
> >> on the timing of that as of yet, but please let me know if any of you
> are
> >> planning to attend RightsCon, and might be willing to join me there for
> a
> >> bit.
> >>
> >>
> >> Title: Is Multistakeholder Internet Governance Advancing, Dying, or
> >> Evolving?
> >>
> >> This session, jointly organized by UNESCO and ICANN’s Non-Commercial
> Users’
> >> Constituency, aims to foster a robust discussion on the strengths and
> >> weaknesses of multistakeholder models and to develop recommendations to
> >> improve these processes in the future. Multistakeholder governance
> models
> >> are built around the idea of bringing diverse stakeholders together to
> >> collaborate on policy making solutions. These models have become
> >> particularly prevalent in Internet governance, where representatives
> from
> >> the commercial, technical, academic, governmental and civil society
> sectors
> >> all have a seat at the table and share a role in policymaking. However,
> >> systems that are designed to be egalitarian can nonetheless manifest
> biases
> >> in practice. In ICANN’s case, although the IANA transition has already
> >> occurred, uncertainty persists over where governments’ role in Internet
> >> governance ends and ICANN’s begins, allowing the former to wield a
> powerful
> >> stick over the process. Meanwhile, human rights advocates and other
> >> non-commercial interests, who in theory engage on an equal footing with
> >> their counterparts from the business community, can be placed at a
> natural
> >> disadvantage by the fact that they generally have fewer resources to
> work
> >> with. The session will welcome participants from ICANN staff, its
> >> Governmental Advisory Committee, and commercial and non-commercial
> (civil
> >> society) participants in the ICANN process. Among the entry points to
> the
> >> discussion will be a recent study released by UNESCO, “What if we all
> >> governed the Internet? Advancing multistakeholder participation in
> Internet
> >> governance”, which was developed as part of the UNESCO Series on
> Internet
> >> Freedom. The session will be moderated by UNESCO representative Ms.
> Xianhong
> >> Hu and Mr. Michael Karanicolas of the Executive Committee of ICANN's
> >> Non-Commercial Users’ Constituency.
> >>
> >> Speakers (all TBC):
> >>
> >> Ms. Anri van der Spuy, Research ICT Africa, civil society, South Africa
> >> Mr. Benedicto Fonseca (Brazilian Ambassador for Internet issues), Brazil
> >> Mr. Jeremy Malcolm (Australian, M), Senior Global Policy Analyst at
> >> Electronic Frontier Foundation
> >> Ms. Susan Kawaguchi (American, F), Facebook representative to ICANN
> >> Ms. Theresa Swinehart (American, F), Senior Vice President,
> Multistakeholder
> >> Strategy And Strategic Initiatives, ICANN
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20180308/43a3eb82/attachment.html>