[NCUC-DISCUSS] [Ext] Fellowship Request for ICANN 62 Policy Forum

[dorothy g]

Very well put Olga and thanks again Renata for looking out for your
constituents. Your loyalty is clear.

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Olga Kyryliuk <olga_kyryliuk at ukr.net>
wrote:

> Dear Renata and All,
>
> I believe there was nothing wrong in bringing the issue to the attention
> of the constituency. This is life, things happen - both good and bad. And
> people need support not only with "congrats" but especially in situations,
> which just don't go right. Easy to judge when situations like this don't
> concern us personally. It's not a matter of influencing or reversing the
> decision, which is done. In my understanding chair's request was only about
> double-checking the administrative procedures before giving false hopes in
> the future.
>
> Regards,
> Olga Kyryliuk
>
>
> *4 марта 2018, 14:56:43, от "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino at gmail.com
> <raquino at gmail.com>>:*
>
> Hi
> This fellowship cancellation is done and this is irreversible, as well as
> whatever effect it had.
> Fellowship program (regional or otherwise) does not have consultation w/
> Chair or Constituency, never did. So there is possibility to influence the
> process. All Chair does is distribution of call.
> There was really a public call and public announcement of results. There
> usually is an announcement of results for funding processes in our mailing
> lists, even when Constituency leader is just the "messenger" and selection
> is done by organization, just like we let members know when Nextgen or
> Fellowship results are out.
> James G. (long time no speak!) and Stephanie, on your concerns on sharing
> this "glitch in the system" thread:
> I addressed 1 member distress situation and asked for this not to happen
> again.
> Perhaps you are right I didn't need to see the thread, for that I
> apologize.
> However the enigmatic situation which caused all this remains and I
> reinforce that it should not happen to any other member.
> While the result of this process, so far, that we know of, affected only
> one member, the whole process was public as a call was shared and
> inquiries/applications were sent by a dozen or so members. So informing
> members and having the thread for proof is what I decided to do.
> Best,
> Renata
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing listNcuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.orghttps://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20180306/f187f0a8/attachment.html>