[NCUC-DISCUSS] [Announcement] PC NCSG NCUC rep.

Thu Jun 28 23:41:34 CEST 2018

Welcome to the PC, dear Claudio. There is always a first experience and i am sure you will do well. 

-----------------
Arsène Tungali,
about.me/ArseneTungali
+243 993810967
GPG: 523644A0
Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo

Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)

> On Jun 28, 2018, at 5:42 PM, Cláudio Lucena <claudiokilla at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thank you all and I hope to be able to finish this replacement period with the necessary contributions. It is a first time experience from me, I'm available and I'd be more than happy to hear and consider all your thoughts, comments, concerns and suggestions so we can channel them appropriately.
> 
> I share Dorothy's, Collin's and Stephanie's concerns about the importance of a consolidated policy approach whenever possible, considering that the interests of these constituencies are more often than not aligned, but I also think with the correct approach, communication and commitment we can turn this challenge into a valuable opportunity for wider engagement.
> 
> Thank you all once again.
> Best,
> Cláudio
> --
> Cláudio S. de Lucena Neto
> 
>   
>   
> 
> Visiting Research Fellow
> The Center for Cyber, Law and Policy, University of Haifa, Israel
> **
> PhD Candidate, Research Centre for the Future of Law
> Católica Global School of Law, Universidade Católica Portuguesa
> *
> Researcher, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
> Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior de Portugal
> *
> Professor of Law, Center for Legal Studies
> Paraíba State University (UEPB), Brazil
> 
> LinkedIn: https://br.linkedin.com/pub/cláudio-lucena/22/7a8/822
> 
> Universidade Estadual da Paraíba
> www.uepb.edu.br
> Centro de Ciências Jurídicas - Campus I
> Departamento de Direito Privado
> Rua Coronel Salvino de Figueiredo, 157
> CEP 58.400-253
> Campina Grande - PB - Brasil
> Fone/Fax: *55 83 3310 9753
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This message, as well as any attached document, may contain information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email by mistake.
> 
> 
>> Em qui, 28 de jun de 2018 às 08:31, Joan katambi <joanhopek at gmail.com> escreveu:
>> Congs' Claudio
>> 
>> Joan
>> 
>>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> For background, the concept of policy committee (PC) was already in the older bylaws and it was not an addition to the new bylaws. The amendments in last bylaws were to update it and solve the inconsistencies. The PC was inactive de facto for years since the GNSO restructuring as we moved policy discussion and coordination at NCSG level. I think that will continue.
>>> 
>>> I can understand that many may have concerns or find issues about NCUC PC or Vice-Chair but there was some rationale for them. For example, Vice-chair position is not an unusual one and it is there to ensure that someone can fill the chair tasks in case of any problem in accordance with what the bylaws state. 
>>> 
>>> The bylaws or charter are constitutional documents, they give guidance and principles but don't into go into the specifics and details. The bylaws or charter cannot envision all cases and scenarios but leave implementation to the operating procedures which are there to make things clear and outline how things functions. 
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Rafik
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Le jeu. 28 juin 2018 à 14:13, Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>> This whole discussion would have happened by the time the NCUC charter was being discussed and before it being adopted by us here and then by a Board resolution. 
>>>> 
>>>> I am sure many of us (including myself) didn’t carefully read the draft charter, we would have noted issues like PCs or Vice Chair roles. I hope next time we take time to read these types of documents during consultation (or public comment) stage.
>>>> 
>>>> The NCUC chair is simply doing her job, implementing our agreed upon charter.
>>>> 
>>>> Though i agree that we should only have one PC at SG level (with reps from Constituencies) but i am inclined to see how this opportunity will be used by our members at constituency level, an opportunity to engage in policy work. Then we can judge its effectiveness and act accordingly. I urge those who took the Policy Writing course to consider populating these PCs and use the gained knowledge there as well.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Arsene
>>>> -----------------
>>>> Arsène Tungali,
>>>> about.me/ArseneTungali
>>>> +243 993810967
>>>> GPG: 523644A0
>>>> Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 28, 2018, at 4:15 AM, Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Congratulations Claudio as new  PC NCSG NCUC representative.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> As per the Policy Committe for NPOC, my suggestion will be to let the committee be as long as they can make 10 members, this another opportunities for engagement of members as long as their work can consolidate other committees work.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Benjamin
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:02 AM, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I completely agree with the arguments put forth for joint effort and collective action. Nevertheless, it might be beneficial to know the rationale behind the introduction of constituency-level PCs in the new bylaws.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Tomslin
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu., 28 Jun. 2018, 08:30 Collin Kurre, <collin at article19.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I support the suggestion that we consolidate policy committees. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Rather than splitting into smaller factions, which I believe would further silo conversations and diminish our potential collective impact, non-commercial stakeholders should seek to coordinate more effectively in order to effect positive change through joint action. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Collin Kurre
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jun 27, 2018, at 12:05, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> May I humbly suggest that this proliferation of policy committees (now we have 3) should be re-examined if it does not result in coordinated input on the policy input for GNSO council and comments.  I am not sure we have enough forward motion at the NCSG level, and cross communication is not great  Lets try to ensure that all PC members are in copy on all activities, so that we do not unnecessarily duplicate each others research, discussion, and outreach.
>>>>>>>>> On 2018-06-27 10:10, Renata Aquino Ribeiro wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Dear members
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The EC has concluded the deliberation for PC NCSG NCUC representative.
>>>>>>>>> The term is until after the election of the new EC (after October) as
>>>>>>>>> this representative will be a replacement.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The selected was Claudio Lucena. Votes received from AP, EU and LAC EC.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> We would like to thank all candidates who participated on the process
>>>>>>>>> and remind you that there are many different ways of participating
>>>>>>>>> with NCUC.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Per implementation of our bylaws, we will soon build the Policy
>>>>>>>>> Committee NCUC and we hope you keep interested as this group has to
>>>>>>>>> have 10 participants.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Renata
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20180628/d26249d5/attachment.html>