[NCUC-DISCUSS] [Announcement] PC NCSG NCUC rep.

[Arsène Tungali]

This whole discussion would have happened by the time the NCUC charter was being discussed and before it being adopted by us here and then by a Board resolution. 

I am sure many of us (including myself) didn’t carefully read the draft charter, we would have noted issues like PCs or Vice Chair roles. I hope next time we take time to read these types of documents during consultation (or public comment) stage.

The NCUC chair is simply doing her job, implementing our agreed upon charter.

Though i agree that we should only have one PC at SG level (with reps from Constituencies) but i am inclined to see how this opportunity will be used by our members at constituency level, an opportunity to engage in policy work. Then we can judge its effectiveness and act accordingly. I urge those who took the Policy Writing course to consider populating these PCs and use the gained knowledge there as well.

Thanks,
Arsene
-----------------
Arsène Tungali,
about.me/ArseneTungali
+243 993810967
GPG: 523644A0
Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo

Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)

> On Jun 28, 2018, at 4:15 AM, Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Congratulations Claudio as new  PC NCSG NCUC representative.
> 
> 
> As per the Policy Committe for NPOC, my suggestion will be to let the committee be as long as they can make 10 members, this another opportunities for engagement of members as long as their work can consolidate other committees work.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Benjamin
> 
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:02 AM, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I completely agree with the arguments put forth for joint effort and collective action. Nevertheless, it might be beneficial to know the rationale behind the introduction of constituency-level PCs in the new bylaws.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Tomslin
>> 
>>> On Thu., 28 Jun. 2018, 08:30 Collin Kurre, <collin at article19.org> wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>> 
>>> I support the suggestion that we consolidate policy committees. 
>>> 
>>> Rather than splitting into smaller factions, which I believe would further silo conversations and diminish our potential collective impact, non-commercial stakeholders should seek to coordinate more effectively in order to effect positive change through joint action. 
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Collin Kurre
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 27, 2018, at 12:05, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> May I humbly suggest that this proliferation of policy committees (now we have 3) should be re-examined if it does not result in coordinated input on the policy input for GNSO council and comments.  I am not sure we have enough forward motion at the NCSG level, and cross communication is not great  Lets try to ensure that all PC members are in copy on all activities, so that we do not unnecessarily duplicate each others research, discussion, and outreach.
>>>>> On 2018-06-27 10:10, Renata Aquino Ribeiro wrote:
>>>>> Dear members
>>>>> 
>>>>> The EC has concluded the deliberation for PC NCSG NCUC representative.
>>>>> The term is until after the election of the new EC (after October) as
>>>>> this representative will be a replacement.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The selected was Claudio Lucena. Votes received from AP, EU and LAC EC.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We would like to thank all candidates who participated on the process
>>>>> and remind you that there are many different ways of participating
>>>>> with NCUC.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Per implementation of our bylaws, we will soon build the Policy
>>>>> Committee NCUC and we hope you keep interested as this group has to
>>>>> have 10 participants.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you
>>>>> 
>>>>> Renata
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20180628/964de780/attachment.html>