[NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Policy Course Program - for comments

Gabriela Gijón mariagabriela.gijon at gmail.com
Tue Jan 16 16:58:06 CET 2018


Thanks for your answer Renata! Big hug for u!

Gaby

2018-01-16 10:20 GMT-03:00 Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>:

> Hi Gaby
>
> yes, remote participation will be available for all members
>
> Thank you
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:10 AM, Gabriela Gijón
> <mariagabriela.gijon at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi everybody! Renata I won't be able to attend the next ICANN 61 but I'm
> > interested in the NCUC Policy Course Program. Is Remote participation
> > included?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Gaby
> >
> > 2018-01-15 4:43 GMT-03:00 Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> Thanks Renata
> >> In addition to comments so far, may we add a kind of
> mentorship/internship
> >> after the training to ensure that participants take part in drafting
> >> comments as case arises not precluding our volunteers system calls,
> that way
> >> the measurable effect notes by Auden can be taken care of, with a
> >> certificate of participation at conclusion, bearing that comments draft
> per
> >> subject differ extensively.
> >>
> >> Weldone
> >> Remmy Nweke
> >>
> >> On 15 Jan 2018 08:30, "Ayden Férdeline" <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, Renata-
> >>>
> >>> I have added some comments to the Google Doc. In a nutshell, I hope
> this
> >>> course is not obsessively focused on procedure and on rhetoric, but
> helps
> >>> our members understand how to come up with the very substance that
> supports
> >>> an information-rich, evidence-informed public comment. Our goal should
> be to
> >>> draft statements and other documents that support appropriate and
> informed
> >>> decision-making; I'm not seeing that in the proposal that ICANN
> consultants
> >>> have drafted here.
> >>>
> >>> On evaluation, I see that "a post-training webinar w[ill] be conducted
> to
> >>> solicit feedback from those NCUC members who participated in the
> webinar and
> >>> face-to-face training on the effectiveness of that training." In my
> opinion,
> >>> the ultimate measure of success is not self-reported satisfaction, but
> a
> >>> measurable increase in the numbers of public comments wholly drafted by
> >>> participants in this program.
> >>>
> >>> Best wishes, Ayden
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -------- Original Message --------
> >>> Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Policy Course Program - for comments
> >>> Local Time: 15 January 2018 4:27 AM
> >>> UTC Time: 15 January 2018 03:27
> >>> From: raquino at gmail.com
> >>> To: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> >>>
> >>> Dear members
> >>>
> >>> Our NCUC Policy Course at ICANN61 preparations are ongoing.
> >>>
> >>> We have a program now for the course and we would like you to comment
> on
> >>> it until 17 Jan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/12n-i56ksjCXUbkqhIsdLmEWG72R-
> q8Xzv0QQ9RuXSu8/edit?usp=sharing
> >>>
> >>> Apologies on the short deadline but this is just the outline of the
> >>> course, we will have many more activities and opportunities to
> participate
> >>> following this.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Renata
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> >>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> >>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> >> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> >> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> >>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20180116/83fa24f3/attachment.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list