[NCUC-DISCUSS] PIR Meeting

[David Cake]

My understanding is that the copyright takedown part of the policy has been shelved. Other takedown and content regulation policies are still in place, and while these are policies that we do not object to the existence of (eg takedowns for obviously illegal content, that registries would be obliged to act on anyway), we would still like a more open process that proactively involves civil society input. 

David

Sent from my iPad

> On 22 Sep 2017, at 10:38 am, Jeremy Malcolm <jmalcolm at eff.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 21/9/17 9:05 pm, farzaneh badii wrote:
>> One of the agenda items that I think NCUC would be interested in is their takedown policy. If you remember, PIR wanted to come up with the Systematic Alternative Dispute Resolution which would resolve copyright related disputes through a third party. We opposed their plan and especially asked them not to develop the policy any further. 
>> 
>> I am not sure of the status of this policy but they asked how they can seek public comment for the dispute resolution and we again responded that we disagree with having such policy in the first place.
> 
> FWIW I spoke to Brian Cute from PIR back in July and he told me that the policy had been permanently shelved.
> 
> -- 
> Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Global Policy Analyst
> Electronic Frontier Foundation
> https://eff.org
> jmalcolm at eff.org
> 
> Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161
> 
> :: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::
> 
> Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/11/27/key_jmalcolm.txt
> PGP fingerprint: 75D2 4C0D 35EA EA2F 8CA8 8F79 4911 EC4A EDDF 1122
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170922/401dbfe4/attachment.html>