[NCUC-DISCUSS] MAG Renewal and CSCG from Deirdre Williams

[David Cake]

It is NCSG that participate, not NCUC, so the issues is slightly broader than NCUC. So I’ve pushed this message to that list, 

I think there are some great points in this post, and I am in general agreement. 

David

> On 17 Oct 2017, at 12:23 am, Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> De posted this timely email to BB, JNC and the IGC. I think it's important the NCUC consider her ideas as well, so here it is:
> 
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> Mandela said “Just because you’re small you don’t have to be cowards.” Civil society may be small – we don’t have the obvious power of the big multi-national corporations – but that’s no excuse for shoddiness, which is a sort of cowardice, which means giving up before you even begin.
> 
> 
> 
> The Civil Society Coordination Group was, is, a great idea. It’s a means by which we could harness the power of numbers which is civil society’s great treasure. But it will only work if we do it properly, and recently we haven’t been doing it properly. Understand that this is a criticism of the institution and not of individual members who tried hard to “do things properly”.
> 
> 
> 
> Participation is about doing things, about active involvement. Volunteering is only a preliminary, it is not sufficient by itself. If one volunteers or accepts a nomination, then one has been entrusted to do something for a whole group of other people, and this is a serious responsibility. If it then becomes impossible to complete the task the only responsible action is to step down and clear the space for someone else who will have the time, the energy, and the commitment. To stay and do nothing is irresponsible and shameful.
> 
> 
> 
> CSCG is still quite new and has no official standing in the selection process. To gain the trust of the final selectors (in this case the UN) it is necessary that CSCG must gain the trust of the constituency it claims to represent (civil society), and is clearly seen to be trusted by civil society generally. If civil society can’t be bothered then CSCG has no reason to exist.
> 
> 
> 
> Things to consider:
> 
> Timing – this year the MAG renewal is being carried out over a very short period of time. CSCG can be a rather cumbersome process.
> 
> Suggestion: we don’t have to wait for the last minute. We know how many terms civil society MAG members have served so we have an idea of how many replacements will be needed. A call could be made at a convenient time and Nomcoms could meet in anticipation of the renewal call and have a slate of candidates ready. Then when the call comes it is just a case of checking that those chosen for endorsement are still available. (Won’t help this time, but worth thinking about)
> 
> 
> 
> Scope: How do we make CSCG truly representative of the diversity of civil society?
> 
> Suggestions: CSCG began with 6 member coalitions. CIVICUS and Diplo have both dropped out. Do the four that are left represent the range of civil society? (I don’t think so.) Can we find a way to use the growing body of local and regional IGFs and other national and regional initiatives (NRIs) to help to create a more inclusive CSCG? Is there another way to do this?
> 
> 
> 
> Criteria for selection: What attributes do we require in a civil society MAG member?
> 
> Suggestions: For the MAG endorsement it should be possible to decide the type of candidate that civil society needs. At bottom the MAG is about running the IGF. Therefore some experience of the IGF is needed (not necessarily in situ, but certainly evidence of previous engagement and experience; this is not the right place for “giving the newbies a chance”). What other criteria are needed? Demonstrated willingness to work? Ability to work as part of a team? (I would add ability to listen as well as to talk because candidates will be representing civil society as a whole if they are eventually selected – they need to be aware of the range of what civil society as a group is thinking.) I’m sure there are other criteria. This should be a continuing discussion.
> 
> 
> 
> Participation: How should the Nomcom deal with a situation of having to function more or less without one or more of its members? Are valid decisions possible in these circumstances?
> 
> Suggestions: Don’t leave things to the last moment. Do insist that volunteers demonstrate their commitment. Arrange for alternates so that in the case of a real emergency there is someone else ready to take the place of the affected member.
> 
> 
> 
> CSCG is supposed to be the creation of global civil society. It’s important that we think about these things because CSCG is supposed to be making decisions on OUR behalf about who are the best people to represent US. Each of us should ensure that the process is being carried out as we would want it to be.
> 
> 
> 
> This is an issue that needs our urgent attention.
> 
> 
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> 
> 
> De Williams
> 
> 
> ______________________________
> 
> 
> Ginger (Virginia) Paque
> 
> IG and E-diplomacy Programmes | Research Associate
> DiploFoundation
> 
> WMO | 7bis, Avenue de la Paix | 1202 Geneva - Switzerland
> www.diplomacy.edu <http://www.diplomacy.edu/> 
> 
>  <http://15years.diplomacy.edu/> <http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20171017/01f196ab/attachment.html>