[NCUC-DISCUSS] GDPR Cross-Community Session at ICANN

[Stephanie Perrin]

I would say that we should initiate a privacy impact assessment process 
(which includes constitutional rights) on every PDP.  Mandatory as part 
of the scoping process.  This requires a dataflow map.

I think ICANN must investigate Binding Corporate rules and contractual 
clauses.

cheers Stephanie


On 2017-10-08 12:00, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>
> In regard to this question in the document:
>
> To surface ICANN community reactions, preferences, and proposals for 
> next steps in reconciling WHOIS with GDPR 
> <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj>.
>
> What “next steps” do NCUC/NCSG propose? To intervene effectively in 
> this panel, we need to have a specific proposal regarding next steps.
>
> *From:*Ncuc-discuss [mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] *On 
> Behalf Of *farzaneh badii
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 7, 2017 4:50 PM
> *To:* NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> *Subject:* [NCUC-DISCUSS] GDPR Cross-Community Session at ICANN
>
> All,
>
> Biz Constituency proposed to have a cross community session at ICANN 
> on GDPR. They have come up with the first draft but since this is a 
> cross community session we are entitled to (as a community) to comment 
> on it.
>
> Please take a look and comment, I will then forward to Steve Del Bianco.
>
>
> <goog_642886535>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VcorTQOTy_MtN9mlz3ame_drbuNOu60TDl5RJcrmMEw/edit?usp=sharing
>
> We want to avoid getting disappointed again for not being present on 
> the panel on an issue we care about and advocated for, for years.
>
> Best
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20171010/dcc53e92/attachment.html>