[NCUC-DISCUSS] KSK rollover "750 million ppl at risk"

[Michael J. Oghia]

Indeed James. I don't understand why ICANN's technical team is getting so
much flak for this. I think it's responsible and reasonable, especially
with the amount of users potentially affected.

Imagine what the community would say if they went through with it solely to
meet the deadline (even if they knew it wasn't ready)?

-Michael


On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:56 AM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>
wrote:

> Why the Facepalm? This is a perfect example of risk management based on
> data
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 5 Oct 2017, at 23:50, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20170928_icann_delays_plans_
> to_change_dns_cryptographic_key/
>
> <facepalm>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20171006/7d953add/attachment.html>