[NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN Information Transparency Initiative
Ayden Férdeline
icann at ferdeline.com
Mon Oct 2 22:15:39 CEST 2017
Good points, Renata. And thank you for introducing this new acronym to me, the FAIR data principles. In my experience the ICANN website is not one where information is findable - let alone the other three letters...
—Ayden
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN Information Transparency Initiative
> Local Time: 27 September 2017 4:22 PM
> UTC Time: 27 September 2017 15:22
> From: raquino at gmail.com
> To: Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>
> NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>
> Hi Michael
>
> I agree it"s good to see something moving forward.
>
> However, there"s a lot of jargon around transparency and open data
> which do not always translate into a collaborative process which takes
> into account these ideas themselves.
> There has been a lot o investment in announcements and information
> displays but where are the datasets? Is there an open contracting
> process involved for ICANN partners working in this initiative?
> How accountable this whole process is?
>
> If the aim is to find information in ICANN better, once more, which
> information is this process dealing with? The information may be
> public but is it free and FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Inter-operable
> and Re-usable)?
>
> So even before, I guess, providing inputs, it"s easy to see we have
> more questions and answers.
>
> It"s fine to say transparency is being looked for but which are the
> steps there to achieve it?
>
> Best,
>
> Renata
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Michael Karanicolas
> <mkaranicolas at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for sharing, Renata. This touches on a really important area.
>> Information management and organization has been brought up a few
>> times at the WS2 Face to Face Plenaries, with Göran at one point
>> saying that resourcing this was a priority of his. Proper information
>> management is a pre-requisite to a healthy DIDP and disclosure system,
>> and as ICANN"s public information expands it"s increasingly important
>> to ensure that the information they put out is accessible and
>> delivered in a user-friendly way. I don"t know much about how
>> specifically this is being done, but at a glance it seems to hit some
>> of the right notes in terms of auditing and tagging content, and
>> creating a proper searchable taxonomy.
>>
>> In other words - very important initiative. Not sure about the
>> details, and I"d be very interested to learn more, but it"s good to
>> see something"s moving forward on this front.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>> <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This was tweeted as
>>>
>>> "To improve ICANN Findability"
>>>
>>> I did not find where one can contribute other than wait and see :)
>>>
>>> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/creating-content-governance-and-rebuilding-the-infrastructure-of-icann-s-public-sites
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20171002/353e2382/attachment.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list