[NCUC-DISCUSS] Nomcom
Dan Krimm
dan at musicunbound.com
Fri Jul 28 22:20:25 CEST 2017
The +1 expressions are not functional in an electoral sense. But they
do fulfill a social/community function in terms of public collective
response. They are part of our discussion as a group.
There will be a formal election at some point, secret ballot using the
usual ICANN tally system, and that will decide the choice.
I am also happy to see two excellent candidates. It's better not to
have unopposed candidates for election, if only for "structural" reasons.
Dan
On 7/28/17 12:46 PM, dorothy g wrote:
> Hi Can someone clarify the process for deciding between these two
> excellent candidates? I am not sure if these +1 mails are of any value.
>
> best regards
> D
>
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Stephanie Perrin
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>
> Generally I would say yes, but I think it is a good idea for the
> candidates to answer the questions first, since I a sure we are
> likely to get into a vigorous group discussion and the purpose of
> this is to hear what the candidates might have as answers...Can we
> wait for this discussion?
>
> cheers Stephanie
>
>
> On 2017-07-28 14:11, Renata Aquino Ribeiro wrote:
>> Hi Yolanda
>>
>> Yes you should give your views
>> You can choose to share them only in the Africa list or broader
>> Your regional rep can use of your group's advice
>> But I believe so do we all so that is your option :)
>>
>>
>>
>> Em 28/07/2017 14:17, "Yolanda Mlonzi" <mamiyaomhle at gmail.com
>> <mailto:mamiyaomhle at gmail.com>> escreveu:
>>
>> This is such a great question Ayden!
>>
>> Looking forward to hearing the responses...
>>
>> Silly question (newbie 😅) are we allowed to give our views
>> on questions posed to candidates or should we wait to hear
>> their responses?
>>
>> Yolanda.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Ayden Férdeline
>> <icann at ferdeline.com <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am glad to hear that we have two nominations for this
>> position. Like Renata, I also have a question for our
>> candidates:
>>
>> * One of the jobs of the Nominating Committee, as best
>> I understand it, is to ensure that the maximum number
>> of qualified people are willing to offer themselves
>> as nominees for a given role. If you uncover
>> impediments which discourage people from being
>> nominated who might otherwise be qualified and
>> willing to volunteer their time, how would you go
>> about eliminating or reducing those impediments?
>>
>> I ask this because this is not just a problem which you
>> might face on the NomCom. We as NCUC members might face
>> it soon too. In the coming months we are going to have
>> elections for a number of important roles (as many as
>> four seats on the GNSO Council, as well as leadership
>> roles on both the NCSG EC and NCUC EC). Not having a
>> complete slate of candidates could be problematic from
>> the perspective of diversity and in terms of making sure
>> we have enough people both with new views and the right
>> amount of institutional knowledge. Have you any tips you
>> can share with us on how to build large nominee pools?
>>
>> Thanks again for stepping forward.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Ayden Férdeline
>> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>>
>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Nomcom
>>> Local Time: July 28, 2017 3:04 PM
>>> UTC Time: July 28, 2017 2:04 PM
>>> From: raquino at gmail.com <mailto:raquino at gmail.com>
>>> To: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> <mailto:ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>>
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> It is such good news we have 2 nominations for Nomcom.
>>> And both women from Africa.
>>>
>>> As NCUC LAC member, I'm happy to see Global South
>>> representation.
>>>
>>> LAC is not represented in numbers well enough in the
>>> ICANN community.
>>> We do hope that changes.
>>>
>>> Will the chosen representative be appointed be EC or vote?
>>>
>>> Whatever path taken, I believe who decides will have a
>>> better chance of assessing if we hear more from candidates.
>>> I'd personally would like to know:
>>>
>>> - What are your thoughts and strategies for advancement
>>> of diversity in ICANN, especially Global South
>>> participation?
>>>
>>> - If Ines is chosen, do we have to choose a new EC Africa?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170728/985f2ab1/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list