[NCUC-DISCUSS] A problem in registration form for ICANN60 Abu Dhabi
Cedric Laurant
cedric at laurant.org
Mon Jul 17 07:34:34 CEST 2017
It is indeed irrelevant for the purpose of a public event registration.
What might be relevant is how people want to be addressed in
correspondence or in panels. It would therefore be sufficient to add a
field with "Mr"/"Mrs"/"Dr", etc.
Cédric
On 7/17/17 12:18 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> We might want to lobby to change the "Other" selection to
> "don't want to say" or "irrelevant" something to that effect
> and then all select that.
>
> Even better would be to get rid of the question altogether
> on grounds that it is irrelevant.
>
> Tapani
>
>
> On Jul 16 21:12, Renata Aquino Ribeiro (raquino at gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> I have just read the raw transcript of the last WS2-Diversity meeting
>>
>> Meeting page
>>
>> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=66089058
>>
>> Raw transcript
>>
>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66089058/DIVERSITY%20SUBGROUP%20MEETING%20_07132017-FINAL-en.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1500220959000&api=v2
>>
>> The raw transcript means it is the 1st form of the transcript, no corrections
>>
>> But what I read made me caught my attention enough to share this on the lists
>>
>> Especially giving the discussion about reviewing where meetings happen
>>
>> Apparently there was a "concern" with registration to ICANN60 because
>> "a form" presented the follow question and options of response
>>
>> Gender: Male/Female/Other
>>
>> The "other" option raised the "concern" and ombudsman brought up that
>> this was the theme of a conversation w/ local organization
>>
>> So what would happen if ICANN had, let's say, a number of
>> registrations of "Other" ?
>>
>> Would this be theme for other conversations between ombudsman and
>> local organizers?
>>
>> Are there any data collected by registration form that would cause
>> "concern" to local organizers?
>>
>> And sorry about the extensive use of quote marks. The words are a bit
>> surprising and I tried to soften the blow.
>>
>> Renata
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
--
Cédric Laurant
Global Data Privacy Attorney & Public Policy Expert
(http://cedriclaurant.com)
Attorney at Law (District of Columbia Bar, USA) - Abogado | CIPM,
CIPP/US, CIPP/E, FIP
Cedric at Laurant.org (**)
(**) GPG: 347F F3D6 DBE5 8075 5B2C E093 1FEC 5AC6 220B 2548 (Download:
http://tinyurl.com/email-cedric)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170717/db7646c4/attachment-0002.sig>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list