[NCUC-DISCUSS] Selection of ICANN meeting venues and dates
avri@acm.org
avri at doria.org
Sun Jul 9 03:06:01 CEST 2017
Hi,
The last one was more of a blue ribbon panel than a proper ccwg.
I think this requires wide organized discussion.
We can always invent some new process.
Avri
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
-------- Original message --------From: James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net> Date: 7/8/17 14:07 (GMT-05:00) To: Niels ten Oever <lists at digitaldissidents.org>, ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Selection of ICANN meeting venues and dates
Agree, the last one didn’t exactly end spectacularly, I think is something that staff can handle given the authority to do si.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ncuc-discuss [mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
Sent: 08 July 2017 19:05
To: ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Selection of ICANN meeting venues and dates
On 07/08/2017 06:17 PM, farzaneh badii wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The CEO is asking:
>
> 1) Do you think it is timely to open up a broader discussion about
> adding rules on how to choose meeting venues: factors such as gender
> issues, democratic principles, and strict rules in observance of
> religious holidays, etc., have been among the questions that have been
> raised.
Yes, I suggest similar approach to:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-07
>
> 2) How do you anticipate such a discussion to take place?
>
> Some of you have commented on this already on another thread at NCSG
> mailing list. I will relay those comments. But question 2 needs more
> answers.
>
> If you have any particular views please discuss here.
>
Maybe community could be asked for input, which could be re-worked by staff into a document which would be opened for public comment.
Am not sure we would need a fully fledged ccwg for this.
Best,
Niels
> Best
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
--
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital
Article 19
www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 _______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170708/4aa36f96/attachment.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list