[NCUC-DISCUSS] The use of +1 's ... and why some people might be reluctant to post
Ginger Paque
virginiap at diplomacy.edu
Mon Jul 31 16:57:25 CEST 2017
I just sent this message offlist to Sean, in reply to his comments:
*Sean said:*
Guys if am not mistaking, the email from the NCUC Chair suggests that a
decision has been made by the EC on this matter. ... May I suggest the
+1s be put to rest.
*Ginger replied OFFLIST:*
... I don't want to get involved in a discussion on the list, but I think
the arguments in favor of +1, and the continued use of +1 tell us that it
is a very important and useful tool. What's your objection? I'd rather see
you contradicting the chair than discouraging the use of +1, especially for
those who don't write well in English :)
*Ginger (new)*
I've decided now to use this as a clear example of another reason people
lurk instead of engaging, and might prefer to use +1s. I also note that it
is possible that Sean's comment was meant to be read between the lines.
In the last year or so on several IG-related lists, posting a comment often
elicits (not referring to the chair here in any way, shape, or form, just
using the topic as an example) an antagonistic and/or aggressive
response instead of discussion. I mention it here because it is relevant to
the +1 issue. My English is decent, and I'm pretty outspoken myself, but I
have to admit it has seriously affected my engagement.
Happy (hopefully) IG discussions.
Cheers, Ginger
Virginia Paque
DiploFoundation
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170731/7842301d/attachment.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list