[NCUC-DISCUSS] Agenda for Copenhagen NCUC - Constituency day

[Adeel Sadiq]

+1 Milton

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>
wrote:

> Ask all three (Ron, Lousewiese, Khaled). See how they play off against
> each other, where they agree, disagree, etc. Stroke three birds with one
> hand ;-) (preferable to killing them with one stone, no?)
>
>
>
> --MM
>
>
>
> *From:* Ncuc-discuss [mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Ayden Férdeline
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 19, 2017 6:36 PM
> *To:* Farzaneh Badiei <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Agenda for Copenhagen NCUC - Constituency
> day
>
>
>
> I would like to lend my support to sending an invitation to Ron da Silva
> to join us, or if he is not available, Lousewies van der Laan, so that we
> can raise their awareness of our activities.
>
>
> - Ayden
>
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Agenda for Copenhagen NCUC - Constituency day
>
> Local Time: 19 February 2017 11:25 PM
>
> UTC Time: 19 February 2017 23:25
>
> From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
>
> To: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>
>
>
> Someone pointed out to me that Ranjbar is not a Board member but an RSSAC
> liaison  to ICANN Board of directors. I had the impression that he actually
> in this role interacted with the Board (he is a nonvoting member of  Risk
> Committee of the Board) and that having a neutral person at our meeting
> who liaised and collaborated with Board would have been a good idea.
> However, since he is not a Board member, you might want to invite someone
> else on the Board of Directors to know more about what we are doing.
>
>
>
> we could invite Ron https://www.icann.org/profiles/ron-da-silva or
>
>
>
>  Khaled https://www.icann.org/profiles/khaled-koubaa
> <https://www.icann.org/profiles/khaled-koubaa>
>
>
>
> I think it would be a good strategy to have one on one collaboration with
> the Board of directors. But if you think this is not a viable strategy, and
> might be even problematic, we can spend this time on more interesting
> issues please do not hesitate to make your suggestions.
>
>
>
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:35 PM, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
>
>
> To prepare for our constituency day in Copenhagen, the agenda below is
> suggested. Please make suggestions until Wednesday this week. We will
> then finalize the agenda at EC.
>
>
>
> [Time might change]
>
>
>
> 8.30 to 9.30: Introduction/ NCUC and shaping policy at NCSG and ICANN
> (discussing the take aways from Sunday meeting on NCSG policy committee)
>
>
>
> 9.30 to 10.00: NCUC members and the Executive Committee dialogue ( ask us
> questions)
>
>
>
> 10.00 Break
>
>
>
> 10.30  An introduction to NCUC for newcomers and fellows 45 minutes: What
> we do at NCUC and why you should join us if interested in noncommercial
> users rights at ICANN
>
>
>
> speakers [not invited yet] Niels: HR -  Rachel: Freedom of expression and
> domain name policies, Renata: Internet governance and its relation to ICANN
> and NCUC work, Tatiana wraps up
>
>
>
> 11.15, 12.00  (TBD)
>
>
>
> Invite Goran to discuss human rights
>
>
>
> Invite Kaveh Ranjbar the current ICANN Board member from RSSAC . We just
> introduce him to what we do and what we care about and just get to know him
> -  (I suggest having more regular meetings with Board members so that they
> get to know us, this will be the first meeting of such meetings)
>
>
>
>
>
> Best
>
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170220/5497b84a/attachment-0002.html>