[NCUC-DISCUSS] Meeting with ICANN CEO

[Renata Aquino Ribeiro]

Hi

Mike: Yes, thanks for the reframing

I do understand also that time is limited and, yes, there's also an
importance to invite to constituency day.


On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Michael Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Good points Renata, I support them in principle. However, I think it's best
> to avoid asking him questions that a simple yes or no question will suffice.
> Instead, it's better to ask questions that seek more substantive answers.
> For instance, instead of number 5 (which is a great question), we can frame
> it as (something along the lines of) "Given the political transition with
> the new administration, how do you envision ICANN's relationship with the
> Department of Commerce going forward?"
>
> Best,
> -Michael
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I agree w/ Ed but also
>>
>> * With the visa travel ban, organizations such as IETF and ISOC are
>> reviewing their actions for the time period the USA will be subject to
>> their new president mandate, ICANN also issued a communiqué on this
>> matter. What are the strategies in place to ensure international
>> participation remains a reality in ICANN? Specifically updates on:
>> 1) Will there be a contract with a visa agency to help with travel
>> arrangements?
>> 2) Will the meeting in Puerto Rico remain as planned? Couldn't it move
>> to Mexico?
>> 3) Will ICANN reassure its commitment to diversity, which NCUC is
>> devoted to work towards too in WS2, and work on increasing
>> participation and leadership position from developing and least
>> developed countries and women?
>> 4) ICANN jurisdiction being in the USA, can we be assured ICANN will
>> try to safeguard legally its international status?
>> 5) Is ICANN monitoring the transition process of the Secretary of
>> Commerce, given that with the former appointee ICANN had extensive
>> dialogue which ensured the IANA transition came to completion?
>>
>> [NCUC-DISCUSS] Meeting with ICANN CEO
>>
>> Edward Morris egmorris1 at toast.net
>> Mon Feb 6 14:33:42 CET 2017
>>
>> Previous message (by thread): [NCUC-DISCUSS] Meeting with ICANN CEO
>> Next message (by thread): [NCUC-DISCUSS] Meeting with ICANN CEO
>> Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> Hi Farzi,
>>
>>  Here's one:
>>
>>  Ninety seven American hi tech companies signed an amicus brief supporting
>> the State of Washington's lawsuit against United States President Donald
>> Trump (
>>
>> http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/business/amicus-brief-by-tech-com
>> panies/2322/ ) and his travel ban.
>>
>>  ICANN is an American high tech corporation impacted by the ban.
>>
>>  Did:
>>
>>  1. ICANN consider joining with its fellow American hi tech companies in
>> signing onto this brief?,
>>  2. If so, why did it decide not to do so?
>>  3. If not, why not?
>>  4. Does the CEO agree that the travel ban has serious repercussions  for
>> ICANN? If so, what does ICANN intend to do, if anything,  to mitigate the
>> harm this ban is causing and potentially will, if extended, continue to
>> cause ICANN corporate and community?
>>
>>  Thanks for considering,
>>
>>  Ed Morris
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>