[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: Brief points on Public Interest Registry advisory council meeting

[Ayden Férdeline]

A huge thank you to you, Farzaneh, for representing us so professionally and intelligently on the Public Interest Registry (PIR) Advisory Council. It is useful to receive updates on their work, and I look forward to reviewing the below-mentioned concept paper when it is available. My initial reaction - having not read the concept paper, of course - is that the best way for the PIR to receive feedback on the Systematic Copyright Alternative Dispute Resolution would be to keep the deliberations within existing ICANN mechanisms. One option might be the establishment of a Policy Development Process (I realise that PIR cannot just ask that one be initiated), as they are something our membership is already familiar with, and allow for the participation of all impacted and interested stakeholders. In any case, all stakeholders should in my opinion have a mechanism through which to meaningfully input into this policy prior to a decision being made to adopt it.

- Ayden

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: Brief points on Public Interest Registry advisory council meeting
Local Time: 4 April 2017 7:31 PM
UTC Time: 4 April 2017 18:31
From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
To: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>

Dear NCUC members

I am representing NCUC on the PIR advisory council and had my first meeting
was
a week ago. Below are a number of issues that were discussed which I could disclose.

1. Development of the concept of the Systematic Copyright Alternative Dispute Resolution was within the past 18 months, presented at 4 ICANN meetings and presented at two Internet and Jurisdiction Project Meetings. The advisory council was not consulted with directly.

2. PIR asked the advisory council to come up with a concept paper on the process of how to ask the community about SCADR to determine whether or not to implement such a proposal. The concept paper on the process of seeking feedback can then be sent by the representatives of the advisory council to their respective community (in our case to NCUC) for comments.

3. I requested to have more information about the SCADR sent to the advisory council. Perhaps a background paper would be good.The dissemination of the background paper will be limited to the advisory council.

4. There will be a face to face meeting for the advisory council between September to October

Best

Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170404/e7a70f55/attachment-0002.html>