[NCUC-DISCUSS] [Important] NCUC Bylaws amendment consultation process

[Renata Aquino Ribeiro]

Hi
Agree there. Members are vetted when they apply to join.If there is inactivity
could be also they are waiting for a time when it is safe to participate.Kicking
those out would hurt transparency too.
Best,
Renata
 





On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 10:15 AM, avri doria avri at acm.org
wrote:
apologies for the seemingly encrypted message. i sent if from a mobile

where i do not think i have encryption.

trying to figure out what happened.




what i was trying to send:




Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] [Important] NCUC Bylaws amendment

consultation process




Hi,




Part of the reason there is a differentiation in NCSG between active and

non active, is so majorities and super majorities are possible. When

half the membership is unresponsive it becomes hard to get anything done

in a vote that requires a percentage of the membership. Perhaps if NCUC

can build on that existing NCSG classification it will help.




I also see little purpose in kicking members out unless you have

specific reason beyond inactivity.




Avri













---

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.

https://www.avast.com/antivirus




_______________________________________________

Ncuc-discuss mailing list

Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org

http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20160909/ce8e3704/attachment-0002.html>