[NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Charter Review Call Agenda

[Renata Aquino Ribeiro]

+1
I've sent also apologies as I'm also unable to attend

Hopefully Kathy's points also "sprinkle" on membership procedures debate

Em 17 de out de 2016 11:11 AM, "Kathy Kleiman" <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
escreveu:

> new section: The purpose of the Noncommercial Users Constituency is to
> represent, through its elected representatives  the interests and concerns
> of noncommercial registrants and noncommercial Internet users of generic
> Top‑Level Domains (gTLDs).
>
> On 10/17/2016 10:09 AM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>
> Totally agree Kathy, but what part of the revisions triggered this
> comment?
>
>
>
> *From:* Ncuc-discuss [mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org
> <ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org>] *On Behalf Of *Kathy Kleiman
> *Sent:* Monday, October 17, 2016 10:04 AM
> *To:* ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> *Subject:* Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Charter Review Call Agenda
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I cannot make this meeting, but I think the Purpose of NCUC has been
> misplaced. The Purpose of NCUC is to represent Noncommercial Communication
> Online - political speech, personal speech, research and education speech,
> hobby speech and individual speech.  Domain names for Noncommercial
> Purposes. It's to represent the whole range of communication that is NOT
> commercial, but the range of thoughts, expression and communication that is
> even more important than Commercial.
>
> If we are only representing noncommercial registrants and noncommercial
> Internet users of gTLDs, than we are representing every trade association
> in the world (all noncommmercial in their corporate status).
>
> We are the only voice of individuals and organizations using the DNS for *Noncommercial
> Purposes*. This is intrinsic to our integrity, our reputation and the
> coherence of our positions.
>
> Best, Kathy
>
>
>
> On 10/16/2016 11:56 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> The meeting of NCUC members for the review of NCUC Bylaws will take place
> Monday 17th October at 14.00 UTC. NCUC EC has gone through the comments and
> has made changes to reflect the comments. There are some remaining issues
> that will be discussed tomorrow. If you would like to know how the NCUC EC
> implemented your suggestion, you can either join the call and ask or you
> can look at the NCUC Bylaws google doc. Click here for link to NCUC
> Bylaws.
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wYP4-JGKA_u6QligvViBkygzj8Q62kmFF-ky5XSWWDU/edit> Please
> also check the google doc notifications.
>
>
>
> Agenda
>
>
>
> 1. The three questions that were sent to mailing list and answers : NCSG
> bylaws and alignments of NCUC bylaws - Inclusion removal of officers and
> members procedures in the bylaws, addition of section VIII - for
> participation of NCUC in the empowered community.
>
>
>
> 2. Recent pressing issues:
>
>    - *The purpose of NCUC *
>    - *Adding accountability language*
>    - *Social purpose companies*
>    - *Official representatives of orgs and holding office at NCUC*
>    - *Eligibility of consultants to commercial entities and conflict of
>    interest III(I)(1)*
>
> 3. Reviewing the second draft based on members comments
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rafik Dammak
>
> NCUC chair
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20161017/12816919/attachment-0002.html>