[NCUC-DISCUSS] NomCom Review

Tapani Tarvainen ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info
Sat Nov 26 18:18:59 CET 2016


Giraffe. :-)

(For those who weren't in Hyderabad: NCSG got a wooden giraffe as a
gift from James Gitau. It was promptly declared The Official Giraffe
of NCSG and named PlusOne. I'm happy to report it made the flight back
from there safely and is now under my care. I will pass it on to the
next NCSG Chair in Abu Dhabi.)

In any case, it is indeed good that this discussion has now taken
an educational turn, for these issues are indeed complex and newbies
have a steep learning curve with them.

Tapani

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:58:57AM -0500, avri doria (avri at acm.org) wrote:

> 
> +1
> 
> 
> On 26-Nov-16 11:52, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> > Below you make a proposal that I think is a very good one – that there
> > should be 2 Nomcom reps per GNSO SG. You also help Raoul and others to
> > understand why we can’t just demand more seats for ourselves. You
> > raise awareness of the fact that other parts of ICANN, notably ALAC
> > and CCNSO, might oppose this proposal, which allows us to prepare
> > arguments supporting that position  against likely counterarguments.
> > This is all very constructive. Once the Review committee is convened,
> > it will be too late to educate the members about what is at stake. We
> > need to do that now. 


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list