[NCUC-DISCUSS] Bribery at ICANN

[James Gannon]

Im sorry Raoul but I would appreciate if you would engage with my questions rather than dismissing them out of hand. These are serious concerns, and as someone who has spent almost 3 years working on building bridges and relationships in ICANN between us and other stakeholders I would like to see you back up your accusations. Conspiracy and fear have no place in the ICANN and NCUC I wish to participate in.

So please be more specific, who do you think is being bribed and by whom?

-James

/I have changed the title to split this off from the originating conversation./

From: Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com<mailto:plommer at gmail.com>>
Date: Friday 25 November 2016 at 09:51
To: James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net<mailto:james at cyberinvasion.net>>
Cc: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>>, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com<mailto:julf at julf.com>>
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NomCom Review

This is big business to the tune of billions. I think it's ludicrous to state that bribery never takes place in ICANN. People get killed for far less monies. But this is besides my point and it's insistence can be seen as a willing effort to derail the real conversation we should be having.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20161125/7dcf297f/attachment.html>