[NCUC-DISCUSS] Berkman Center to review the proposal to NTIA

Divina MEIGS divina.meigs at orange.fr
Mon Mar 21 08:27:19 CET 2016


Well put Stéphanie...

It was the meaning of my own comment...  Multistakeholderism has a long way to go, research included

divina

 

 

 

 

> Message du 21/03/16 01:54
> De : "Carlos Afonso" 
> A : "Stephanie Perrin" , "William Drake" 
> Copie à : "NCUC-discuss" 
> Objet : Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Berkman Center to review the proposal to NTIA
> 
> Of course... Agree with Stephanie. frt rgds --c.a. On 3/19/16 12:53, Stephanie Perrin wrote: > I would have done a call for proposals, and I would have favored in my > assessment criteria a university consortium from a range of countries > that had Internet governance experience and strong academic credentials, > with economic (market) and civil society participation. > Not that hard to do....they blew it. The European Commission does this > kind of tendering all the time.....they would know better, I suspect, > than to sole source this one. Too important. > Not that Berkman is per se bad....just US based and an ICANN regular. > steph > > On 2016-03-19 11:46, William Drake wrote: >> Hi Stephanie >> >> I don’t know if I’d go as far as to say this ‘ruins' it; Berkman’s >> done multiple reviews for ICANN over the years and they have a lot of >> people etc. they can put on the case, and in any event their input is >> just that. But like Avri I did find the 'the only capable source’ >> framing to be a bit much…I’d guess that’s how NIST sells contracts for >> local consumption. >> >> Who would you have advised NTIA to have gone with instead? >> >> Best >> >> Bill >> >> >>> On Mar 19, 2016, at 16:35, Stephanie Perrin >>>  wrote: >>> >>> Wow. What BS. What are the Europeans going to say about this? (let >>> alone the Chinese.....) >>> How could you take all that work done over the past year by a >>> multi-stakeholder organization and ruin it by sole-sourcing to Harvard? >>> Steph >>> >>> On 2016-03-19 10:36, avri doria wrote: >>>> fascinating. >>>> >>>>> the only capable source that can provide an independent review and >>>>> assessment of a non-profit corporate governance structure designed for >>>>> a multistakeholder setting >>>> On 19-Mar-16 10:07, William Drake wrote: >>>>> May be of interest to some… >>>>> >>>>> https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=bfc9cbacbbeb27a0ff16b3bef68c8657&tab=core&_cview=1 >>>>> >>>>> Bill >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ************************************************************* >>>>> William J. Drake >>>>> International Fellow & Lecturer >>>>> Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ >>>>> University of Zurich, Switzerland >>>>> william.drake at uzh.ch >>>>>  (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com >>>>>  (lists), >>>>> www.williamdrake.org  >>>>> /The Working Group on Internet Governance - 10th Anniversary >>>>> Reflections/ >>>>> New book at http://amzn.to/22hWZxC >>>>> ************************************************************* >>>>> > > _______________________________________________ > Ncuc-discuss mailing list > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org > http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss -- Carlos A. Afonso Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br CGI.br - http://cgi.br GPG 0x9EE8F8E3 _______________________________________________ Ncuc-discuss mailing list Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20160321/324ce2b2/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list