[NCUC-DISCUSS] [Info] Call for candidates for NCUC Delegate to the ICANN 2017 Nominating Committee
Stephanie Perrin
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
Sun Jul 31 21:27:08 CEST 2016
I too would like to support Bill, and encourage him to push them to
review the Nomcom rules. On this subject, it is worth noting that
Nomcom veterans declare it to be such a process ( I would not know first
hand, never having served on it) that it is very worthwhile to keep our
rep there for two years, since it takes a whole year to find your feet
under the table. We have done this in the past. Having said that, I do
think folks who want to nominate/self nominate should do so regardless
of the strong show of support for Bill. We need to keep interesting
people in the process, and in the many and various tasks required of us
as NCSG. This one is a really important one, as we have only one spot
and this is the group that selects half the Board....
Best
Stephanie Perrin
On 2016-07-31 13:43, Sonigitu Ekpe wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I put forward my support for Bill as stated by Prof. Wolf.
>
> Highly experienced Bill to continue the navigation of the ICANN
> network in favour of Non Commercial Users Constituency.
>
> Best regards.
>
> Sonigitu
>
>
> On 31 Jul 2016 6:21 p.m., "Remmy Nweke" <remmyn at gmail.com
> <mailto:remmyn at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Avri for once again being in the champion of this alongside
> others.
>
> Unfortunately, from my understanding, ICANN laws are reviewed
> every five years, that in the first instance shows that NomCom
> rules of engagement should have been reviewed this year or by next
> year max.
>
> However, ICANN was reviewed last February 2016, just wondering how
> this escaped most of us.
>
> I think what we may do is to first establish when exactly this
> review should occur, this year or next, depending if the review
> date must elapse before action is taken or proactively initiate
> the process to culminate into precise year of transition.
>
> Our leadership is hereby called upon to take the necessary calls
> to initiate this process and stop this maginalisation with the
> leadership of NPOC now under Klaus Stoll. I am sure we should be
> able to gain some mileage and erase the injustice to NPOC.
>
> Best of the day from Lagos and happy new week.
> Remmy
>
>
>
> ____
> REMMY NWEKE, mNGE,
> Lead Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
> DigitalSENSE Africa Media [/Multiple-award winning medium/]
> (DigitalSENSE Business News
> <http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; ITREALMS
> <http://www.itrealms.com.ng>, NaijaAgroNet
> <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng>)
> Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza, Bolade Junction,
> Oshodi-Lagos
> M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, 8051000475, T: @ITRealms
> <http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
> Author: A Decade of ICT Reportage in Nigeria
> <https://www.facebook.com/adecadeofictreportageinnigeria%E2%80%8E>
> PC Summit 2016 <http://www.pcsummit.com.ng>, December 2-3 @Federal
> Palace, Victoria Island, Lagos.
> _________________________________________________________________
> *Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and
> attachments are confidential and may also be privileged
> information. It is intended only for the use of the named
> recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal responsibility for
> the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document
> and do not disclose the contents of this document to any other
> person, nor make any copies. Violators may face court persecution.
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 4:16 PM, avri doria <avri at apc.org
> <mailto:avri at apc.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I should have said, when the Nomcom is next reviewed, I hope
> people
> mention it.
>
> We tried last year to convince the Board, but they said, no:
> wait until
> it is reviewed, restructured or otherwise fixed.
>
>
> Last nomcom review ended in 2012. Is it time again yet?
>
>
> avri
>
>
>
> On 31-Jul-16 11:09, avri doria wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On 31-Jul-16 06:52, Edward Morris wrote:
> >> It should be noted that the CSG has three times the
> representation on the NomCom as does the NCSG. Our colleagues
> in NPOC continue to be denied a slot on the body, the only
> GNSO constituency treated in this manner. While making the
> fine short handed work of Bill and Brenden all the more
> impressive, the principle of equity with our commercial
> friends is one we need to insist on and should pursue with
> increased vigour as ICANN enters a new era.
> > yes. good to see this brought up again.
> > i hope the people who spoke to those interviewing for the
> Nomcom review
> > brought this up to them.
> >
> > avri
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
> software.
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> > http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
> software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20160731/0c4484ef/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list