[NCUC-DISCUSS] Anti-harassment policy draft comment
James Gannon
james at cyberinvasion.net
Sat Dec 24 11:50:30 CET 2016
Hi Corinne
Sorry but Im going to ask we revert to the old document
1. This doc is restricted access.
2. We should continue to work on the previous document please as it cpatures the various discussion threads which are important to readers and to be able to understand the context for ‘dissent’
-James
From: Ncuc-discuss [mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] On Behalf Of Corinne Cath
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2016 6:02 AM
To: Ncuc-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Anti-harassment policy draft comment
Dear all,
I trust this email finds you well. I have tried to capture some of the on-going discussions about the NCUC statement on the proposed ICANN anti-harassment policy in this new Google doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/13lGVdvforHYev-0wBLboGBlz4qa0AnOwGXWHnxMW-uI/edit
The prior one was great for discussing and laying the ground work, but after all our robust discussions the comments drowned out the actual text.
I have tried to prepare the document by rewriting it in the more formal comment style of the NCUC. That being said, I fully understand that we are still discussing this and that several issues remain unresolved. Which is why I have also added several 'dissenting views sections'. We can continue to discuss those or otherwise adapt the text.
I understand not much will happen in the next couple of days, but wanted to ensure that those of you working over the holidays have a clean text to start from.
Happy holidays!
--
Corinne J.N. Cath
Ph.D. Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute & Alan Turing Institute
Web: www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath<http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath>
Email: ccath at turing.ac.uk<mailto:ccath at turing.ac.uk> & corinnecath at gmail.com<mailto:corinnecath at gmail.com>
Twitter: @C_Cath
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20161224/1fd4e193/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list