[NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN Community Anti-Harassment Policy: Summary of Discussion So Far

[Corinne Cath]

Much appreciated, sorry we did not properly get to meet at the IGF. Looking
forward to your comments and those of the others who committed to taking
this text forward. Best,

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 18:02 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:

> Corinne,
>
> Thank you for this. This is an excellent starting point. I have added a
> few comments to your text but overwhelmingly I support your positions. In
> particular, decentralising the role of the Ombudsperson in resolving
> complains of harassment strikes me as a better path forward. Now that the
> IGF has ended, I will endeavour to expand upon this draft by our internal
> deadline of Thursday.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN Community Anti-Harassment Policy:
> Summary of Discussion So Far
> Local Time: 7 December 2016 7:27 PM
> UTC Time: 7 December 2016 19:27
> From: corinnecath at gmail.com
> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>
> Dear all,
> To jumpstart this effort I have added some text to the Google doc. With
> the holidays coming up it might be good to be mindful of the initial
> deadline set by Rafik for next week Thursday.
> Looking forward to discuss.
> Best,
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> please find the google doc here
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YeZ_zCbv2RbLA5ypUnWmwNpTte8lyUOuSzlvToXHLrQ/edit
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> 2016-11-23 3:20 GMT+09:00 hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>:
>
> + 1 absolutely that would be more efficient.
>
>
> Le mardi 22 novembre 2016, matthew shears <mshears at cdt.org> a écrit :
>
> + 1 Rafik - that would be very helpful.
>
> On 22/11/2016 06:36, Rafik Dammak
> wrote:
>
> Hi Shane,
>
> thanks for this effort to summarise the
> discussion, really helpful.
> I think we can move those items to
> either google doc, etherpad and so on to work on the statement
> and let people comment directly or proposing edits there.
> definitely it is not early to start if we want to find a
> consensus based text. if everyone is ok, I can create a google
> doc quickly .
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
>
> 2016-11-22 14:15 GMT+09:00
> Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org>:
>
> Hello,
>
> Apologies if I mis-characterize the
> discussion. It is not my intent to
> pursue an agenda regarding the discussion
> here, but rather to try to
> see where we are at and to make sure that the
> topic doesn't get dropped.
>
> It seems there are some areas of agreement
> regarding ICANN's proposed
> anti-harassment policy, but also some areas of
> disagreement.
>
> Possible agreement:
>
> * The power of the ombudsperson in this
> process needs to be tempered
>   and/or changed.
>
> Probable disagreement:
>
> * Having a list of examples of harassment is a
> good idea.
> * We should have a procedure for dealing with
> vexatious complaints.
>
> Unsure:
>
> * Privacy of everyone should be insured by the
> process.
> * List of Specified Characteristic is
> unwieldy.
> * Ongoing harassment should be addressed.
> * Specific changes to the role of ombudsperson
> in the process. Perhaps a
>   separate, community (non-staff, non-board)
> position for this?
>
> I don't think that we can get consensus on the
> areas of disagreement.
>
> I would like to hope that we can get consensus
> on at least some of
> those that I am unsure about.
>
> There may be other issues that have not come
> up yet, of course.
>
> Possibly we'll need to commit to having an
> NCUC response as well as
> separate responses by people about issues of
> disagreement?
>
> Is it too early to start drafting text about
> what we do agree on?
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Shane
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
> --
> ------------
> Matthew Shears
> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
> + 44 771 2472987
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> [image: Avast logo]
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
>
> --
> Corinne J.N. Cath
> Ph.D. Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute & Alan Turing Institute
>
> Web: www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath
> Email: ccath at turing.ac.uk & corinnecath at gmail.com
> Twitter: @C_Cath
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20161213/f1859be9/attachment-0002.html>