[NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon

[farzaneh badii]

Hi Tanya,

Thank you. You can provide input until tomorrow 12 UTC.

Please comment here: https://titanpad.com/O9DRaF7KyF

If the pad tortures you too much let me know so that we use something else.


Best

Farzaneh

On 1 December 2016 at 10:39, Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina at mpicc.de> wrote:

> Ayden, I will joining everyone in thanking you for this excellent summary
> of proposals. Thanks also to Farzaneh for sending the link for further
> work. As I was one of those who supported the proposal No. 3, I will
> provide my input there (also because it's a topic of directly connected to
> my main area of work), but my 2c: can we establish a very strict deadline
> for input? So the members know when it is feasible to contribute? I assume
> that after the input it will still have to be finalised before the
> submission deadline, so if it's Monday, may be we can say that the deadline
> for contributions is Saturday or Sunday? Just a suggestion.
>
> I am looking forward to meeting many of you at the IGF! We have a great
> representation of the NCUC there (please join remotely even if you are not
> going to be in Guadalajara!).
>
> Cheers
>
> Tanya
> On 01/12/16 12:53, farzaneh badii wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot Ayden for this summary.
>
> Louise has kindly set up an ُTitanpad to work on a description based on
> the comments and support we received.
>
> Here is the link:  https://titanpad.com/O9DRaF7KyF
>
> I know we usually work with google doc but not bad to see if other tools
> can be used too.
>
> We will finalize the description and revert.
>
> We work on proposal number 3 as it has received a lot of support.
>
> On 1 December 2016 at 06:09, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>
>> Greetings all,
>> Just to summarise this thread; at the moment, we have five proposals:
>>
>> *1. Jurisdictional issues and domain name administration*
>> Supported by Avri Doria, Louise Marie Hurel
>>
>> *2. Adopting multistakeholder processes on the Internet: the case of
>> ICANN*
>> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Aicha
>> Chebbi, Ines Hfaiedh, Benjamin Akinmoyeje
>>
>> *3. Content regulation and private ordering at Internet governance
>> institutions*
>> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Stefania
>> Milan, Michael Oghia, Milton Mueller, Louise Marie Hurel, Ines Hfaiedh,
>> Huthaifa Albustanji, Kabir GZ, Benjamin Akinmoyeje
>>
>> *4. State and future of the Registration Directory Service*
>> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Michael
>> Oghia
>>
>> *5. Volunteers in non-commercial groups*
>> Supported by Carlos Vera, Aicha Chebbi
>>
>> Proposals 1, 2, 3, and 5 are identifying a problem and mapping out the
>> challenges, whereas proposal 4 is more outcome orientated, looking to
>> create solutions to solve an issue.
>>
>> Thus far, proposal 3 has attracted more expressions of support on the
>> list than the other topics have (but this email thread was not a
>> referendum).
>>
>> The deadline for RightsCon proposals is this Monday.
>>
>> Ayden Férdeline
>> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon
>> Local Time: 28 November 2016 12:38 PM
>> UTC Time: 28 November 2016 12:38
>> From: james at cyberinvasion.net
>> To: Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>, farzaneh badii <
>> farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>
>>
>> Most certainly not, we spent many months in the accountability group
>> making sure that we now have strong commitments in the ICANN bylaws against
>> this. And we will fight any attempt to circumvent that through other means.
>>
>> -J
>>
>>
>> *From: *Ncuc-discuss <ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> on behalf of
>> Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Monday 28 November 2016 at 12:32
>> *To: *farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> *Cc: *NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon
>>
>> While the conversation of ICANN in the process of implementing some of
>> her policies and agreement could become a content regulator is also very
>> interesting. There is high probability that some point almost become a
>> content regulator.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Farzaneh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing listNcuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.orghttp://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>


-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20161201/546b986b/attachment-0002.html>