[NCUC-DISCUSS] important information - deep concerns about this action

[Sonigitu Ekpe]

Hi!

Keeping sentiment out of this will be good for all of us. Once the rule
makes Peter ineligible, so be it.

@Remmy - Peter Green was communicated privately and has not responded. Why
has he refused to respond?

It is very important to abide to some ethical behaviour for respect and
honour. We are requesting for ICANN transparency yet individuals don't want
to be transparent.

My fifty cents.

On 9 Aug 2016 8:39 p.m., "Mueller, Milton L" <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:

> All:
>
> I see I overlooked responding to one question Kathy raised at the end of
> her long message:
>
> - Are you invoking NCUC or NCSG rules?
>
> We are concerned entirely with his eligibility for _*NCUC*_ membership
> and thus his eligibility to be on the NCUC Executive Committee. Our
> original message contributed to confusion on this by typing NCSG instead of
> NCUC. A mistake. He is, in fact, ineligible under both rules, but the NCUC
> EC did not ask him to resign from NCSG and has no authority to do so. It
> was acting in regards to NCUC eligibility.
>
>
>
> Dr. Milton L. Mueller
>
> Professor, School of Public Policy
>
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20160810/6b862747/attachment-0002.html>