[NCUC-DISCUSS] Acceptance of nomination for NCUC EC

Benjamin Akinmoyeje benakin at gmail.com
Tue Nov 10 10:10:12 CET 2015


First off, I appreciate the work the Prof has done for 16 years, so I
publicly announced that I am one of those knocking at his door to join the
race, though I am not from the NA region nor physically present at his door
to knock it.

He has built trust from the historical knowledge and delivered his
functions all this while.
But as it was said NCUC is not legally an organization yet, we need to fix
that and he is well positioned to help fix that now.

My suggestion to all is for us to look at the critical issues that will
allow the change to happen.
We need to get NCUC become a legal entity that the banking system can
recognize and hence we can set up what ever system, Treasurer - secretary
or  Treasurer.

Thanks Bill for calling our attention to the bylaws, I would have gone
ahead with the process without blinking an eyelid, but now I am more
enlightened about the bylaws, 16 years history of NCUC , trust for the
prof. and why I should vote in NCUC elections.


Thank you,
Benjamin

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:21 AM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>
wrote:

> That’s the whole problem though, NCUC does not exist as an organisation
> therefore we don’t have an organisational bank account so its impossible to
> do so.
>
> -James
>
> From: Ncuc-discuss <ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> on behalf of
> Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
> Date: Tuesday 10 November 2015 at 12:49 a.m.
> To: Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>
> Cc: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Acceptance of nomination for NCUC EC
>
> Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> On 10 Nov 2015 00:28, "Tapani Tarvainen" <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 10 07:51, Andrew A. Adams (aaa at meiji.ac.jp) wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > But we really should have at least two people who can access the
> > account.
>
> SO:
>
> I don't think this should require much convincing to be agreed upon.
> Having 2 account signatories is just a normal organisation standard.
>
> Regards
>
> _______________________________________________
> > Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> > http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20151110/00695418/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list