[NCUC-DISCUSS] Acceptance of nomination for NCUC EC

[James Gannon]

That’s the whole problem though, NCUC does not exist as an organisation therefore we don’t have an organisational bank account so its impossible to do so.

-James

From: Ncuc-discuss <ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org>> on behalf of Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com<mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday 10 November 2015 at 12:49 a.m.
To: Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info<mailto:ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>>
Cc: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>>
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Acceptance of nomination for NCUC EC


Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 10 Nov 2015 00:28, "Tapani Tarvainen" <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info<mailto:ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>> wrote:
>
> On Nov 10 07:51, Andrew A. Adams (aaa at meiji.ac.jp<mailto:aaa at meiji.ac.jp>) wrote:
>
>
>
> But we really should have at least two people who can access the
> account.

SO:

I don't think this should require much convincing to be agreed upon. Having 2 account signatories is just a normal organisation standard.

Regards

_______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20151110/69a4ba69/attachment-0002.html>