[NCUC-DISCUSS] What would "good" look like to you for ICANN in 2015?

[Salieu Taal]

I concur with Kathy .
 The human rights aspect and impact tends to be watered down under the guise that it is not within the purview of ICANN which focuses on the domain name administration and policy.  I remember the time even “consumer rights was not seen as part of the ICANN agenda and fast forward civil society is now recognised as an important player in the ICANN multistakeholder approach. 


Regards

Sal
> On 24 Jan 2015, at 19:51, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> please add my strong support for that.
> 
> avri
> 
> On 24-Jan-15 14:36, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>> Hi Bill,
>> I think you should include that "good" for ICANN in 2015 would involve inclusion of Human Rights into the analysis of policy and issues in which ICANN is involved.
>> Best,
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss