[NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Survey Results Analysis - Part I

[William Drake]

Hi

> On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:31 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for this feedback, maintenance and management are critical since most of work would be done by volunteers, who have scarce time to provide . as Tapani, who worked a lot of NCUC website and related tasks,  always reminds me the same question, when we discuss about some tools for NCSG to enhance participation "who is going to be your system admin for this?" :) . so careful evaluation and an iterative approach are needed, in  addition to get members buy-in . btw ICANN wiki is confluence , it is not that bad (I use it at work and it has many useful features) but we don't have enough control on it. The ICANN staff is also working on providing some additional tools to support the community in near future but that also raises the question on how to not be tightly dependent to that.

+1.  We always need to remember that NCUC is a network of volunteers not an NGO with paid staff, so any new optional labor-intensive activities would have to be sustainably undertaken by specific volunteers, not an abstract “someone.”  Please also note that we have an e-platform team that is open to anyone who’d like to pitch in and help.  Any serious consideration and implementation of tools-related issues would have to happen there.  http://www.ncuc.org/participate/working-teams/ <http://www.ncuc.org/participate/working-teams/> 

Cheers

Bill



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20150427/7a299dd6/attachment-0002.html>