[NCUC-DISCUSS] Membership engagement thread

[Seun Ojedeji]

This is much more helpful explanation of what it takes to be on EC.

Thanks.

Cheers!

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 16 Nov 2014 10:06, "William Drake" <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I’d like to amplify a point Stefi made on the NCUC ELECTIONS thread.  The
> EC is in fact a place where one can begin to engage without having a lot of
> background in ICANN policy matters.  Indeed, the current EC has three
> members that were not active in NCUC before they stood for election in Dec.
> 2013, and the same can be said for the EC that was elected in Dec. 2012.
> As she says,  "Being able to answer mails promptly and act as reference
> point for your region of reference (and create opportunities to speak about
> NCUC and recruit new members) is key.”  The former is really the minimum
> requirement; in the two years I’ve done this we have had EC members who for
> whatever reason simply did not reply promptly to emails, if at all, which
> complicated and slowed down decision making and meant I had to spend my
> time sending them follow up messages pleading for responses.  So anyone
> who’s a live body and will respond to mail so group decisions can be made,
> and can do a little outreach within their respective regions, is most
> welcome to stand for election.  And if they get elected and choose to do a
> bit more, e.g. work with the EC and general members on in-reach, our
> e-presences, and other tasks we need performed to be a functioning
> constituency internally and at the stakeholder group level where GNSO
> policy is done, fantastic.
>
> Moreover, NCSG is now represented in the GNSO Council by four members who
> were not here a couple years ago, and NCUC is represented on the NCSG PC by
> someone who came aboard this year, etc.  That said, for the Council or PC
> positions one really does need to either be fairly “plug and play” on GNSO
> policy matters or willing to roll up sleeves and be a quick learner. But
> the main point is, neither NCUC nor NCSG are hermetically sealed spaces
> where only the same “old hands” are continuously reelected or reappointed
> to representative positions; far from it.  The processes are open to
> newbies, but you have to be pro-active enough to engage effectively.
> Reading the mail list discussions (including the archives of previous
> discussions), the NCUC and NCSG websites, the GNSO and ICANN websites are
> good ways to get oriented in that direction.
>
> And I strongly agree when she says,
>
> > Please come forward and make these elections fun! :-)
>
>
> Best
>
> Bill
>
>
> > On Nov 15, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Milan, Stefania <Stefania.Milan at EUI.eu>
> wrote:
> >
> > Great that at least we have a candidate per slot. However, elections to
> be fun must be a tad competitive, right?
> > I want to join Bill in encouraging more people to come forward and stand
> up for election.
> >
> > I can share my own experience, in the hope to encourage more members to
> give this option some consideration: believe it or not, being part of the
> EC is a way of accelerating the learning curve. You don't necessarily have
> to be an expert or someone with a long history in internet governance. In
> fact, what you need is to some hours a week to spare (sometimes more, often
> less than that), and, most importantly, willingness to contribute your
> ideas and enthusiasm. NCUC needs an engaged and responsive EC able to
> support the Chair. Being able to answer mails promptly and act as reference
> point for your region of reference (and create opportunities to speak about
> NCUC and recruit new members) is key.
> >
> > Please come forward and make these elections fun! :-)
> > Stefania
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20141116/64a33fed/attachment-0002.html>