[NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN privacy policy

[Balleste, Roy]

I agree with Avri.  Will this be a new list for members interested in the subject?  Or a list for members drafting policy positions on behalf of the membership?  In the past, it was worked well when NPOC and NCUC worked together in policy positions.

Roy Balleste
Law Library Director &
Professor of Law
St. Thomas University Law Library
16401 NW 37th Avenue
Miami Gardens, FL 33054
305-623-2341


-----Original Message-----
From: ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org [mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 5:30 AM
To: ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN privacy policy

Hi,

I am confused.

<privacy at ipjustice.org> is a relatively small list.  Of course it looks like it could get bigger if everyone wants to join, but I don't see that as a problem as long as it does not get as big as NCUc or the NCSG

I think that doing the work in a smaller open and archived group that focuses on just one subject is a good idea.  I also think that we don't need separate privacy etc list for bot NCUC and NCSG.  But I am one of the people that is less than excited about the competing constituency model and prefer the unified NCSG model.

avri



On 28-Mar-14 15:35, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
> I understand why you want to do this.  This is a working group, to 
> draft something.  I hear rumours there are 350 people on the NCSG 
> discussion list.  I have worked all year trying to get basic, basic 
> concepts of data protection law understood.  I am not sure drafting 
> this thing in such a big group is efficient.  i have no objections 
> sending the small group's concensus draft from the working group to 
> the larger list, but I am mindful of Bill's admonition to keep the 
> traffic low.  if we start discussing definitions, frameworks, 
> jurisdiction, related constitutional protections (remembering there 
> are at least 50 jurisdictions out there with data protection law,) we 
> will never get this thing done. It is supposed to be a short gap 
> analysis of their privacy policy, that is all, not a draft of a new 
> privacy policy.  If that were what we are doing, then maybe we would 
> have to do it in the bigger group. Just saying.  EPIC and PI found it 
> a total nightmare in recent years trying to update the Privacy and 
> Human RIghts Law Handbook, it is just too big now (see link
> http://www.worldlii.org/int/journals/EPICPrivHR/2006/PHR2006-Defining.
> html) I will abide by the decision of this group, but I will also feed 
> my draft in to the EWG if we bog down and cannot reach agreement.  we 
> have a major admission that they need advice, STeve is happy to get 
> it, we gotta move. Cheers SP PS Here is the link to the framework I 
> intend to reference (mostly because it is dated 2002 and I want to 
> underscore just how late ICANN is in recognizing its 
> responsibilities), referring of course to recent updates in EU law, 
> proposed regulation, and the guidance on binding corporate rules from 
> the Art 29 group.
> http://danskprivacynet.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/ipse_finalreport1.pdf.
> If anyone can think of a decent US document to cite, I am all ears, 
> but I am not aware of one. ________________________________________
> From: ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org
> <ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> on behalf of Avri Doria 
> <avri at acm.org> Sent: March 27, 2014 10:11 PM Cc:
> ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN privacy 
> policy
>
> On 27-Mar-14 13:13, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>> I think it is important to decide early on wether we are going to 
>> have separate discussions regarding ICANN's privacy and data 
>> protection policies within their own corporate practices and within 
>> the policies developed through the GNSO impacting obligations imposed 
>> on contracted parties, or not.
>
> I suggest we stick to one NCSG wide discussion space for all of this.
>
> avri _______________________________________________ Ncuc-discuss 
> mailing list Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org 
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss