[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: GNSO PPSAI F2F PDP WG meeting in Los Angeles

[Kathy Kleiman]

Quick note, all, that this is a F2F meeting of /existing /WG members (of 
which NCSG has at least six). Remote participation also available (I am 
told) so that all can monitor what we are doing. It's an experiment in 
facilitation...
Best,
Kathy
:
> Any privacy people able to come to LA a day early, extra night of 
> hotel covered?
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> *From: *Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
>> *Subject: **GNSO PPSAI F2F PDP WG meeting in Los Angeles*
>> *Date: *July 10, 2014 at 5:35:06 PM GMT+2
>> *To: *William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>>
>> *Cc: *Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org 
>> <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>, "gnso-secs at icann.org 
>> <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>" <gnso-secs at icann.org 
>> <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>>
>>
>> Dear All,
>> As you plan your groups travel for the LA meeting, we wanted to make 
>> you aware of the Proxy & Privacy Services Accreditation Issues PDP 
>> F2F WG meeting which is being scheduled as an all day meeting on 
>> Friday 10 October in Los Angeles, just prior to the ICANN meeting. 
>> Each Stakeholder Group will be requested to assign up to 6 existing 
>> WG members to participate in this meeting for whom one hotel night 
>> will be covered (for list of current members, 
>> seehttps://community.icann.org/x/nCifAg). This meeting is part of a 
>> one-year pilot project that was requested by the GNSO Council. For 
>> further information, please see below. You should be receiving a 
>> specific request to identify up to 6 existing WG members per SG 
>> shortly, but we already wanted to flag this meeting to you as you may 
>> want to factor this into your planning for Los Angeles.
>> Best regards,
>> *From:*Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org 
>> <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>
>> *Date:*Tuesday 8 July 2014 17:09
>> *To:*"gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org 
>> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org 
>> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
>> *Subject:*[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Please participate in the doodle poll - 
>> PPSAI F2F meeting in Los Angeles on 10 October
>> Dear All,
>> As discussed during our meeting today, the GNSO Council recently 
>> received approval to implement a pilot project in FY15 to assess the 
>> effect of face-to-face meeting time with the support of a 
>> professional facilitator for GNSO PDP Working Groups under the FY15 
>> Special Community Requests. Having looked at the various stages 
>> current PDP WGs are in, it was decided that it would be an ideal 
>> moment for the PPSAI WG to benefit from such a meeting in conjunction 
>> with the ICANN meeting in LA (October 2014) in preparation for the 
>> publication of the Initial Report. As such, we are looking to 
>> organise a full day meeting of the PPSAI WG on Friday 10 October in 
>> Los Angeles (right before the start of the ICANN meeting).
>> As outlined in the attached proposal that was reviewed by the GNSO 
>> Council in London, the idea would be that each GNSO Stakeholder Group 
>> (SG) assigns up to 6 existing WG members to participate in the F2F 
>> meeting for whom one additional hotel night (from Thursday to Friday) 
>> will be covered. Note: no travel funding (i.e. airfare) to attend the 
>> meeting is foreseen as part of this pilot project -- SGs are expected 
>> to identify WG members that are already funded for their travel 
>> through other means. Should a SG decide not to use all 6 slots, the 
>> WG Chairs may decide to allocate the one additional hotel night to 
>> another WG member, taking into account the overall balance of 
>> participants. In addition, the same applies for 6 SO/AC/individual WG 
>> member slots. Additional WG members may attend the meeting in person 
>> or via remote participation, but no additional funding is available 
>> to cover the additional hotel night.
>> As the ICANN meeting in LA is approaching rapidly, we wanted as a 
>> first step flag this plan to you to allow you to mark your calendars 
>> accordingly. To get an idea whether you would be available to 
>> participate (either in person or remotely), noting that we are aware 
>> that for some it may not be possible yet to provide a definitive 
>> answer at this stage, we would like to ask you to complete the 
>> following doodle poll: http://doodle.com/v6u29dnnui8xb73z.
>> We'll be working closely with the chairs on the planning for the 
>> meeting and will provide you with further updates in due course, but 
>> for now, please mark Friday 10 October in your calendars.
>> Best regards,
>> Marika
>> Glen de Saint Géry
>> GNSO Secretariat
>> *gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org 
>> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>*
>> *http://gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/>*
>
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20140711/b80554dd/attachment-0002.html>