[NCUC-DISCUSS] An example of how NCUC work matters

[Milton L Mueller]

Actually it began with NCUC letters from almost a decade ago....

-----Original Message-----
From: ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org [mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] On Behalf Of William Drake
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 9:38 AM
To: ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] An example of how NCUC work matters

Hi

I was just reading Kevin Murphy's piece on how the EU's Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (i.e. the data commissioners) has again complained to ICANN that the RAA provisions on WHOIS are contrary to the European Data Protection Directive, and couldn't help recalling that this trajectory began with a letter NCUC wrote to them a year and a half ago :-)

http://www.ncuc.org/ARTICLE-29-WORKING-PARTY-OBJECTS-TO-LEA-WHOIS-PROPOSALS-IN-RAA-NEGOTIATIONS/

http://domainincite.com/15680-eu-body-tells-icann-that-2013-raa-really-is-illegal

Bill

***********************************************
William J. Drake
International Fellow & Lecturer
  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
  University of Zurich, Switzerland
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, 
  ICANN, www.ncuc.org
william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
  www.williamdrake.org
***********************************************

_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss