[NCUC-DISCUSS] Increasing GAC influence?

[DeeDee Halleck]

+1
Important point, Amr.
DeeDee


On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:34 PM, Edward Morris <emorris at milk.toast.net>
> wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
> Given the group think mentality that pervades much of the current board
> (apologies to Wolfgang) I can understand Avri’s perspective that it might
> not make much of a difference whether the threshold is 50% or 75% to enable
> the Board to disregard GAC advice. The thing is, we’re talking about Bylaws
> here and Bylaws are designed to outlast any particular Board.
>
>
> Yes…, of course. This is an important point. Our position on this
> shouldn’t be based on how the current board performs its duties or the
> current set of circumstances and context, but rather on by-laws that
> protect the process.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>


-- 
http://www.deepdishwavesofchange.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20140820/197f10ff/attachment-0002.html>