[NCUC-DISCUSS] Increasing GAC influence?

[Avri Doria]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

What it essentially does is put GAC on an equal footing with GNSO,
ccNSO and maybe ASO.

avri


On 18-Aug-14 22:50, William Drake wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Well this is interesting.  ICANN’s proposing a bylaws change that 
> would would require 2/3 of the voting members of the Board to vote
> to act inconsistently with a piece of GAC advice.  Currently, the
> Bylaws require a simple majority of the Board. 
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-amend-gac-advice-2014-08-15-en
>
>
> 
The public comment forum is here
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-bylaws-amend-gac-advice-15aug14/
>
>
> 
Might be good for people to weigh in, individually and/or collectively.
> 
> Michael Geist offers an initial take on this, 
> http://www.michaelgeist.ca/2014/08/government-control-internet-governance-icann-proposes-giving-gac-increased-power-board-decisions/
>
>
> 
Bill _______________________________________________ Ncuc-discuss
> mailing list Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org 
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT8t7yAAoJEOo+L8tCe36HsQAIAKUTJpkPSbE+Kx+GEZ8GwDW1
gBLChEgjBpK8ZKkyItm/DrBna1Ojfr/eRjjoxhHc2DThcRPBZ57drlADCEvSFfYK
QSe9Gw5BQhbX5mEMJJ9vDq+OuqaSjx2w5PO1rBUjjq4buu1dR49Cz0on7UUi5e2O
71yZKixPxNqvddKgVSUtxKl6sqYwmnx0nVNOeW+CLtuL8UdCnmAoxRccPibPNQEX
WBs4FY4DzW4JdjW3Znuy6Uj3zLoZegiZDHBI42mnOEcBC0ZiHU6gD351UfUaAp4c
FiTdyX2dCAqQdU/odiH0HjWdN+AU4IueJtxliEPoSsYwxy891JoyTsx0DTv6yW4=
=vF1F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----