[NCUC-DISCUSS] Hot topic session in BA

[David Cake]

I'd personally say 1, 3, 4, 2. 

Now that the very big risks are off the table (.corp, .name) the name collision issue is intellectual interesting to some of us (including me), but probably not an issue of huge concern to the general community unless you are in an effected new gTLD. 

It is true that Policy and Implementation is a perennial, but it will be a subject of some detailed discussion at the meeting. Whereas, apart from the last panel (which ties into topic 1 anyway) not sure what there will be to discuss about panels that have barely met yet by BA. 
Cheers
David

On 31 Oct 2013, at 3:43 pm, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:

> Hi 
> 
> There will be a session comprising 90 minutes of cross community discussion of two topics, and community members are asked to rank their preferences.
> 
> 1.  Evolution of Internet Governance - Montevideo Statement and Post Bali Activities
> 2.  Names Collision Mitigation Risks
> 3.  Policy and Implementation
> 4.  Strategic Panels
> 
> Personally, my preference ordering would be 1, 4, 3, 2.
> 
> 1 would tie in well as part of a chain of conversations, mobilization efforts, and cross-silo cooperation that could raise NCUC's profile and engagement internally and externally, e.g. BA => Bern IG conference in December => Possible Fadi CS roundtable January/Feb => NCUC policy conference in March => inputs to the Brazil IG reform event.
> 
> 4 would provide a way into both the substantive issues the panels are assessing and the concerns expressed here previously on how such initiatives do or don't fit into the bottom up community-driven model etc.
> 
> 3 is a hardy perennial that has been and will continually be raked over in and out of the the GNSO irrespective of this session.  That said, I know some people think it's the top priority that needs to be discussed whenever wherever.
> 
> 2 is interesting and important but arguably not as time sensitive.
> 
> But that's just my view, and if discussion here provides a different "sense of the room" I'll report that to the planning group.
> 
> Any feedback would be appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
>   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>   University of Zurich, Switzerland
> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, 
>   ICANN, www.ncuc.org
> william.drake at uzh.ch (w), wjdrake at gmail.com (h),
>   www.williamdrake.org
> ***********************************************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20131031/afc3d50b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20131031/afc3d50b/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss