[NCUC-DISCUSS] Hot topic session in BA

[David Cake]

I am just expressing my personal priorities, I won't be bothered at all if the ones NCSG submits are different. 

On 31 Oct 2013, at 3:58 pm, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:

> Hi D
> 
> On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:56 AM, David Cake <dave at difference.com.au> wrote:
> 
>> It is true that Policy and Implementation is a perennial, but it will be a subject of some detailed discussion at the meeting. Whereas, apart from the last panel (which ties into topic 1 anyway) not sure what there will be to discuss about panels that have barely met yet by BA. 
> 
> People had process concerns about how this is being done and whether it's part of a large and disturbing pattern etc.  
> 
> But ok, prefs noted, thanks for the response.
> 
> BD

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20131031/298f693b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20131031/298f693b/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss