[NCSG-Discuss] NCUC News: Teams and Listservs

[Alex Gakuru]

Conversely, but, only history will judge whether this development was
not an indicator marking solidifying oil-water divide? Contrasted with
commercial interests constituencies on other SGs?

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Alain Berranger
<alain.berranger at gmail.com> wrote:
> Avri,
>
> You know I pay a lot of attention to what you say. Thanks for sharing your
> interpretation and shading light on the process you saw happening.
>
> I for one did not see a lot of discussions and if there was I missed them
> obviously.
>
> In the end, what is important is that we all agree it was the thing to do.
> Yes, it has worked as it should have!
>
> The work at NPOC, NCUC and NCSG continues and we are better organized to do
> it now that this decision is made.
>
> Alain
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 20 Jan 2013, at 14:14, Alain Berranger wrote:
>>
>> > I argued and pleaded, to no avail until today,
>>
>>
>> How do you mean to no avail?
>>
>> If things don't happen on your first or tenth mention, it is to no avail?
>> Did you really expect things to change immediately?
>> What NCUC has done up to now was according to charter and yours was one of
>> few voices in NCSG that did not like it.
>>
>> There have been discussions for ever about doing this.  At one point you
>> jumped in and had strong views.
>>
>> So we all kept on talking.
>>
>> And then at a certain point there was a general consensus that it was the
>> thing to do and Bill did it.
>>
>> Seems like it worked as it should have.
>>
>> avri
>
>
>
>
> --
> Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
> Member, Board of Directors, CECI, http://www.ceci.ca
> Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
> Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
> NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
> Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
> O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
> Skype: alain.berranger
>
>
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ
> Ce courriel est confidentiel et est à l’usage exclusif du destinataire
> ci-dessus. Toute personne qui lit le présent message sans en être le
> destinataire, ou l’employé(e) ou la personne responsable de le remettre au
> destinataire, est par les présentes avisée qu’il lui est strictement
> interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer, de le modifier ou de le
> reproduire, en tout ou en partie . Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
> si ce document vous a été communiqué par erreur, veuillez nous en informer
> sur le champ  et détruire ce courriel et toute copie de celui-ci. Merci de
> votre coopération.
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY MESSAGE
> This e-mail message is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of
> the addressee. Please note that, should this message be read by anyone other
> than the addressee, his or her employee or the person responsible for
> forwarding it to the addressee, it is strictly prohibited to disclose,
> distribute, modify or reproduce the contents of this message, in whole or in
> part. If the addressee cannot be reached or if you have received this e-mail
> in error, please notify us immediately and delete this e-mail and destroy
> all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
>