[Ncu-exec] proposed statement for the IOC/IFRC DT resolution
Carlos A. Afonso
ca at CAFONSO.CA
Thu Sep 27 15:45:21 CEST 2012
Me too!
--c.a.
On 09/27/2012 10:14 AM, Brenden Kuerbis wrote:
> I support this statement, thanks Avri.
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Brenden Kuerbis
> Internet Governance Project
> http://internetgovernance.org
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>
>> The IOC/IFRC is claiming consensus on its proposal to suggest a temporary
>> registration block for the IOC and IFRC. This is the statement I propose be
>> added to the statement indicating the disagreement of the NCSG with that
>> proposal.
>>
>> I request that the NCSG-PC endorse this statement.
>>
>> -----
>>
>> The NCSG rejects the 3b "temporary registration block." defined in
>> IOC/IFRC Drafting Team' recommendation for a number of reasons:
>>
>> 1. Policy recommendations from the GNSO on reserved names can only be made
>> by a PDP that is properly constituted and is run according to the process
>> rules as established in the ICANN by-laws.
>>
>> 2. This drafting team continues to circumvent proper process by attempting
>> to make policy as opposed to performing its proper function of fact
>> gathering and presenting information to the council that can be used in
>> deciding on the viability and charter for such a PDP.
>>
>> The NCSG supports the PDP only on the condition that among the possible
>> outcomes is the current status quo, no protection at the second level. We
>> support the PDP as the only appropriate place to resolve this proposal
>> among competing proposals. We believe it is illegitimate to change reserved
>> name policy,,,,, no matter how it is euphemistically named, before the PDP
>> runs its course.
>>
>> The NCSG is also aware of other types of humanitarian organization that
>> also demand these privileges and we feel that any discussion on granting
>> such special reservations must include a full discussion of all who request
>> such reservations.
>>
>> Finally the NCSG does not believe that the reserved name list can be used
>> solely for the purpose of new gTLDs, and that any decisions on adding names
>> to the reserved list must take incumbent registries into account.
>>
>>
>> ------
>> Avri Doria
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncu-exec mailing list
>> Ncu-exec at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ncu-exec
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncu-exec mailing list
> Ncu-exec at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ncu-exec
>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list