Nomcom update

[Rafik Dammak]

thanks Maria for volunteering, a clear message will have an influence for
sure , improving transparency and process need a constant and continuous
support and feedback.

Best,

Rafik



2012/10/28 Maria Farrell <maria.farrell at gmail.com>

> What about a broad message of support to the nomcom about how we're happy
> with moves taken & will watch closely and with interest?
>
> (and then actually watch, closely and with interest..?)
>
> Message could be quite short and sweet - happy to draft/assist.
>
> Maria
>
>
> On 26 October 2012 03:19, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 25 Oct 2012, at 21:43, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>
>> > @Avri thanks for your comment, can you please explain what you mean by
>> issues of process discussion in more detail?
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> e.g.
>>
>> "
>> 5. established clear distinctions between ‘transparency’ and
>> ‘confidentiality
>> "
>>
>> what are those clear distinctions?
>>
>> "
>> 8. did an in-depth review of the Statement of Interest form (SOI) to
>> improve clarity for candidates and to enhance and enable the output of the
>> Committee;
>> "
>>
>> what did that review find. what is being done to improve clarity for
>> candidates
>>
>> "
>> reviews of the 2013 NomCom Rules and Procedures; confidentiality
>> requirements; Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest parameters
>> "
>>
>> Sounds enchanting.  what did these reviews uncover.  What conclusions
>> were reached.
>>
>> What this report does is shows us the covers of the chapter headings, but
>> not the contents.  None of this stuff concerns private data, hence it seems
>> to be stuff that should be explained in greater detail.
>>
>> So while I am grateful for the start, it is a first that should be
>> congratulated, it is only a start.
>>
>> thanks for asking
>>
>> avri
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20121029/fd13b815/attachment-0001.html>