NCUC Nomination for Poncelet

[Nuno Garcia]

Hi all.

The idea of "welcome as many as they come" may look a bit like a "divide
and conquer" strategy.

The rationale supporting a new Constituency would be to have a _real_ need
of such constituency. Being also a member of several Universities, I find
that the interests of Academia is very well represented within NCUC. Yet,
this is my personal point of view.

As bottom line: more constituencies = more entropy = more representativity
(there's a tradeoff there that I'm not sure I would like to bring inside
the SG at this point).

Best regards

Nuno Garcia
NCUC EC member for Europe

Nuno M. Garcia, *Ph.D.*
*Associate Professor, ULHT, Lisbon, Portugal*
*Assistant Professor, UBI, Covilhã, Portugal*
*
*
Av. da Anil, nº 2, 1º Esq.
6200-502 Covilhã
Portugal

mobile: +351 912 552 009
Skype: nunomgarcia
web .................:  http://www.di.ubi.pt/~ngarcia
research lab .....: http://allab.it.ubi.pt
Cisco Academy : http://academiacisco.di.ubi.pt




On 24 October 2012 17:16, Alain Berranger <alain.berranger at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Milton.
>
> So what are you thinking: would you go as far as no more Constituencies?
> no more Stakeholders' Groups? a completely different model based on gTLDs
> communities? What are the practical alternatives to the current model of
> multiple Constituencies in the same SG? I can think of a few myself, but
> nothing short term and until the GNSO management review is completed,
> structures are better left alone, no?
>
> Also, I noted the recent and spontaneous early thinking in Toronto during
> our NCSG meetings (notably by David Cake) about the "real" differences
> between NCUC and NPOC (We have all faced that question - Marie-laure and I
> got it from NPOC's session with the Fellows for instance), maybe we should
> work on that, so that we have a clear message out before the
> inter-sessional and Beijing meetings? Also, how about my "old" idea of an
> Academia Constituency somewhere in the future...? I sensed it was not very
> popular but many other MS organizations use a taxonomy that give a specific
> place to Universities/Academics.
>
> Alain
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
>
>>  OK, thanks Poncelet. So you are not eligible to run for a NCUC
>> position; perhaps you can run for the executive committee of the NPOC. So
>> we will remove your name from the NCUC nominations. ****
>>
>> Sorry for the confusion, this is one reason why I am not enthusiastic
>> about multiple constituencies in the same SG.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] *On Behalf
>> Of *Poncelet Ileleji
>> *Sent:* Monday, October 22, 2012 5:06 AM
>>
>> *To:* NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>> *Subject:* Re: [NCSG-Discuss] NCUC Nomination for Poncelet****
>>
>>  ** **
>>
>> Hello colleagues,
>>
>>
>> Good day, and thanks for all the feed back, am a member of the NPOC
>> constituency and will definitely stick to my membership and role within
>> NPOC constituency.
>>
>> Thanks Remmy for the nomination and to other colleagues for all the views
>> and feed back shared.
>>
>> Best Wishes
>>
>> Poncelet  ****
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
> Member, Board of Directors, CECI, http://www.ceci.ca<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/>
> Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
> Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
> NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
> Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
> O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
> Skype: alain.berranger
>
>
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ
> Ce courriel est confidentiel et est à l’usage exclusif du destinataire
> ci-dessus. Toute personne qui lit le présent message sans en être le
> destinataire, ou l’employé(e) ou la personne responsable de le remettre au
> destinataire, est par les présentes avisée qu’il lui est strictement
> interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer, de le modifier ou de le
> reproduire, en tout ou en partie . Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
> si ce document vous a été communiqué par erreur, veuillez nous en informer
> sur le champ  et détruire ce courriel et toute copie de celui-ci. Merci de
> votre coopération.
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY MESSAGE
> This e-mail message is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use
> of the addressee. Please note that, should this message be read by anyone
> other than the addressee, his or her employee or the person responsible for
> forwarding it to the addressee, it is strictly prohibited to disclose,
> distribute, modify or reproduce the contents of this message, in whole or
> in part. If the addressee cannot be reached or if you have received this
> e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this e-mail and
> destroy all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20121024/456ad329/attachment-0001.html>