ICANN 44 Public Forum agenda

[William Drake]

Anything we want to raise…?


> 
>> De : Filiz Yilmaz <filiz.yilmaz at icann.org>
>> Objet : [Soac-infoalert] ICANN 44 Public Forum agenda
>> Date : 9 mai 2012 17:09:35 HAEC
>> À : "soac-infoalert at icann.org" <soac-infoalert at icann.org>
>> Cc : "steve.crocker at icann.org" <steve.crocker at icann.org>
>> 
>> 
>> [Sent on behalf of Steve Crocker]
>> 
>> 
>> Dear ICANN Community Leaders,
>> 
>> We are approaching ICANN 44 in Prague. 
>> 
>> As usual, we will have a Public Forum that will take place on Thursday, 28 June 2012, where Community members can make comments and ask questions to the Board and in front of the rest of the community.
>> 
>> Following the practice we had in the recent meetings, we would like to build the agenda with your input again as this facilitates the forum process and results in a productive session with the subjects that the Community thinks are important to talk about.
>> 
>> Publishing the agenda as early as possible also facilitates more informed discussions during the Public Forum as we have experienced in recent meetings, allowing the Community ample time to be aware of the agenda topics before the meeting actually starts.  
>> 
>> Please let Filiz Yilmaz (filiz.yilmaz at icann.org) know of one or two suggested topics that your groups would like to see included in the Public Forum agenda in Prague, before the end of Monday, 4 June 2012.
>>  
>> We will then review the suggestions, accommodate them as much as possible, combine common or related topics under one agenda topic and publish the agenda for the Public Forum after my approval. 
>> 
>> Thanks for your consideration and input. 
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Steve Crocker
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> soac-infoalert mailing list
>> soac-infoalert at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120510/72ed1882/attachment.html>