Fwd: [gnso-irtpc] For your review - IRTP Part C Presentation

[Avri Doria]

The initial report being referred can be found at: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/irtp-c-initial-report-04jun12-en.htm

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>
> Subject: RE: [gnso-irtpc] For your review - IRTP Part C Presentation
> Date: 10 June 2012 10:56:58 EDT
> To: "Marika Konings" <marika.konings at icann.org>, "IRTPC Working Group" <gnso-irtpc at icann.org>
> 
> Thank you, Marika.
> 
> Team:  Please circulate these questions amongst your organizations and stakeholder groups / constituencies, and encourage them to (a) submit a comment to the public forum and/or (b) attend the workshop in Prague.
> 
> Also, as we discussed on the call, the next regular meeting of the working group will be Tuesday, July 10.
> 
> See you in Prague!
> 
> J.
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-irtpc] For your review - IRTP Part C Presentation
> From: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
> Date: Thu, June 07, 2012 4:25 am
> To: IRTPC Working Group <gnso-irtpc at icann.org>
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> As discussed during our meeting earlier this week, please find attached for your review the proposed presentation for the IRTP Part C Workshop at the ICANN Meeting in Prague. The open issues that I gathered from the report are the following:
> 
> Charter Question A
> Should there be a restriction following a change of registrant to prevent an immediate change of registrar (e.g. 60-day lock)?
> Which changes qualify as a change of registrant?
> Should it be a stand-alone policy, part of the IRTP or hybrid solution?
> Any unforeseen impacts of the proposed policy?
> Charter Question B
> Time-Limit (45 – 60 days, other?)
> Implementation of this recommendation should be accompanied by the appropriate security measures to protect registrants from hijacking attempts using pre-approval as the attack vector. The details of such security measures are to be discussed in further detail.
> Any unforeseen impacts of the proposed recommendations?
> Charter Question C
> Any unforeseen impacts of the proposed recommendations?
> If there are any other questions that should be included in the presentation or if you have any other comments / edits, please feel free to share those with the mailing list. The idea would be to use a slightly abbreviated version of the presentation for the update to the GNSO Council which is currently scheduled to take place on Saturday 23 June from 11.00 – 11.45 (subject to change).
> 
> With best regards,
> 
> Marika

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120610/05826b86/attachment.html>